Rainstorm wrote:
If you wanna use Hitler for example, is it better for a teacher to say "Hitler is bad. He's evil. He's a terrible person" or is it better for the teacher to give their students information about Hitler (instead of adding their own personal opinion) and the students can make up their own mind about it? Obviously must would say that Hitler was an evil man but there's a much more grey area with Trump. There's no "he's only good" or "he's only bad".. allow the students to think for themselves instead of trying to brainwash them into disliking Trump. Republicans already get enough hate from democrats
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Now, maybe you wouldn't want to compare Trump to Hitler, however there are some parallels, and also some significant differences such as Hitler actually being skilled charismatically - thus being a more appealing character for people in need, whereas Trump is in essence a man child who moans and complain when things doesn't go his way. The detention camps in the US can be compared to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany. How on earth can anyone find it even remotely acceptable to be like yeah but they're illegal immigrants so naturally we should keep them in literal camps and separate children from their parents lmao great idea!!
It's not the teacher's job to share their own personal view in order to influence their studentsRainstorm wrote:
Doesn't matter if they're a US citizens or not, it's still wrong
Err okay so.. no. I disagree at a fundamental level here, I highly doubt you would find it questionable if said teacher criticised Putin for being pretty much a dictator, the leaders of China and North Korea (for obvious reasons), the leader of Venezuela (also obvious reasons) and the list goes on. Furthermore, the politics of today is the history of tomorrow. Few, if any, would accept a teacher to refuse to talk about former politics that turned out to be incredibly horrible at a lot of levels, obvious example: Hitler. Snusmumrikken wrote:
If it's a teacher in a different country in the US I don't see an issue at all it's not like Kent-Roger from .. random place.. ehh.. Karasjok is going to vote for a republican or even Trump. Kent-Roger is more likely to vote on parties in his respective country, Norway.
So?? The teacher shouldn't influence their students into thinking negatively about Trump or republicans (of course not the other way around either)If it's a teacher in a different country in the US I don't see an issue at all it's not like Kent-Roger from .. random place.. ehh.. Karasjok is going to vote for a republican or even Trump. Kent-Roger is more likely to vote on parties in his respective country, Norway.
Doesn't matter if they're a US citizens or not, it's still wrong
Now, maybe you wouldn't want to compare Trump to Hitler, however there are some parallels, and also some significant differences such as Hitler actually being skilled charismatically - thus being a more appealing character for people in need, whereas Trump is in essence a man child who moans and complain when things doesn't go his way. The detention camps in the US can be compared to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany. How on earth can anyone find it even remotely acceptable to be like yeah but they're illegal immigrants so naturally we should keep them in literal camps and separate children from their parents lmao great idea!!
If you wanna use Hitler for example, is it better for a teacher to say "Hitler is bad. He's evil. He's a terrible person" or is it better for the teacher to give their students information about Hitler (instead of adding their own personal opinion) and the students can make up their own mind about it? Obviously must would say that Hitler was an evil man but there's a much more grey area with Trump. There's no "he's only good" or "he's only bad".. allow the students to think for themselves instead of trying to brainwash them into disliking Trump. Republicans already get enough hate from democrats