You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Primordial
Whoever sold me the Masilein hair in MP could you please send me the bg too?
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
gsm coming back?
Private
Youtube star



Rouya wrote:
Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????
ye thats what i meant when i said momio is more successful than gsm its pretty sus
I think its Cooporate speak for: this is a financial risk and we are not sure if this will pay as much as we hope it will in relation as to how much we earn from Momio - aka something that doesn’t earn them as much or less in relation to the resources put in (even if they make money from it) is considered a loss
Private
Minister of Pop



GenderTeam wrote:
i dressed up
slay
Private
World famous



Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????
I think the Danish goSupermodel was supported by Tv2 (Tv channel) in it's glory days, which might've given them more money to work with, so compared to that it's probably true.

But true. If they think there's money in it this time around, they should sacrifice their own money in the company on it instead, and take the risk. That's how most businesses work, and sometimes the gamble fails, sometimes it doesn't.
Private
Popstar



Abby wrote:
Rouya wrote:
Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????
ye thats what i meant when i said momio is more successful than gsm its pretty sus
yes it is really weird
also, just way too many ppl got scammed on IndieGoGo, even if I WAS a diehard fan I wouldn't trust that my money with that
yeahhh same here im just gonna wait and see what happens
Private
Youtube star



CisHetQueen wrote:
Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
Private
World famous



ouch wrote:
DeIure wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:

no, she meant its closer to 23k than 20
It says 235K
Yes, closer to 23k if u switch currency
Yeah. It's 170K for me.
CisHetQueen
Streetmusician



devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:
Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
Private
Popstar



CisHetQueen wrote:
devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
lmfao have you???? why are you a bootlicker lol its fair to question a large corporation
Private
World famous



CisHetQueen wrote:
devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
Fortunately both my parents do, so some of us actually know a little about the process. 
Private
Youtube star



CisHetQueen wrote:
devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
Looks at my furry porn art business sadly: when will anyone take you seriously 
Private
Minister of Pop



devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:
Abby wrote:
also they wrote this

Bringing goSupermodel back again represents a significant investment and risk. Our company has fewer resources than in the glory days of goSupermodel and funding is therefore needed. The code has been dormant for nearly seven years. Therefore we need to make significant changes to get goSupermodel into a state where we can launch it again.

like?
they have a revenue of 5 million what are they talking about
ofc if we remove the taxes and all that there's less but 5 m?????????

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I mean I'm the "burn all corps" type of gal soo
Private
Popstar



just so y'all know that if this is a scam, u will not b getting ur money back and indiegogo is not responsible for ur money loss. the site has been used many times for this kinda stuff with prettier promises than what u r given here
Private
Youtube star



Melody wrote:
just so y'all know that if this is a scam, u will not b getting ur money back and indiegogo is not responsible for ur money loss. the site has been used many times for this kinda stuff with prettier promises than what u r given here
It would be a bit funny if the gsm girlies get scammed
CisHetQueen
Streetmusician



Rouya wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:
devilcake wrote:
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
lmfao have you???? why are you a bootlicker lol its fair to question a large corporation
Actually I have
I'm not a bootlicker just because I know that things aren't as simple as you make it out to be.
Private
Popstar



CisHetQueen wrote:
devilcake wrote:
CisHetQueen wrote:

so what?

it's a completely different project. starting new projects (or bringing back alive old ones) are RISKY. they need to make sure it's profitable, otherwise the higherups at that company wouldn't allow it.
It’s okay to question a big multi million corporate and be eggcited about the site at the same time bestie
I think it's just obvious that none of you have owned businesses before.
i have 
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last