You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
TiredRen
Last day to join sunday by numbers!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
gsm coming back?
GenderTeam
World Famous



phone call in 18 minutes sad
Private
Popstar



Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
wowzies NIMBY sounds like studying it is a lot of work is it
Private
Living Legend



Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
this was a big issue where my dad lives 
everyone was very against the placement of the new vindkraftverk
everytime i go to my dad im so shocked over how close the windmills are to the houses 
Account deleted




Mymble wrote:
Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
this was a big issue where my dad lives 
everyone was very against the placement of the new vindkraftverk
everytime i go to my dad im so shocked over how close the windmills are to the houses 
we had the same at our cabin c: #Frøya
Private
Living Legend



Nesta wrote:
Mymble wrote:
Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
this was a big issue where my dad lives 
everyone was very against the placement of the new vindkraftverk
everytime i go to my dad im so shocked over how close the windmills are to the houses 
we had the same at our cabin c: #Frøya
i know very little about the issue, i should probably read more about it 
but i dont like how they disturb the nature around
Account deleted




Mymble wrote:
Nesta wrote:
Mymble wrote:
this was a big issue where my dad lives 
everyone was very against the placement of the new vindkraftverk
everytime i go to my dad im so shocked over how close the windmills are to the houses 
we had the same at our cabin c: #Frøya
i know very little about the issue, i should probably read more about it 
but i dont like how they disturb the nature around
I want the grunrenteskatt to get approved right away tbh it is one of the few things that keeps windmills to be considered affordable investments 
Account deleted




autism wrote:
Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
wowzies NIMBY sounds like studying it is a lot of work is it
rip me it's just 2 pages of the book
Private
Popstar



Nesta wrote:
autism wrote:
Nesta wrote:
okay so NIMBY (not in my back yard) is a phrase often used by developers to dismiss local concerns about the development of new energy in their local area, primarily renewables as they are increasingly land-based and moving closer to places people live unlike, e.g. oil and gas which is just somewhere out where the fish lives. A social scientific perspective would be to address the feelings of place attachment and place identity that are being disrupted when large changes are happening in someone's local area. Mostly, the revolt against development is due to a feeling of invasion due to a lack of democracy in the decision-making processes, which is considered unjust. It is also normal to pay off different groups of people in cases where development becomes controversies, something that further spikes the feeling of unfairness experienced in the community in relation to the development. Most energy development decisions are taken by the use of top-down processes to more easily get consent for projects they want to do, something that creates knowledge hierarchies. Solutions are a more deliberative form of energy governance embedded in community engagement, eg. volunteering.
wowzies NIMBY sounds like studying it is a lot of work is it
rip me it's just 2 pages of the book
oh just 2 wow that's not a lot does it teach a lot although it's only 2 pages this seems like a very broad topic
Account deleted




autism wrote:
Nesta wrote:
autism wrote:
wowzies NIMBY sounds like studying it is a lot of work is it
rip me it's just 2 pages of the book
oh just 2 wow that's not a lot does it teach a lot although it's only 2 pages this seems like a very broad topic
the curriculum is a large part of the history of energy developments and hope it shaped society and how politics and justice and controversies and all of that is framing current debates and how the future is going to be D: but i sorta gotta understand the broad stuff + some examples at minimum, but at lest NIMBY was one of the important points we should know that is probably the easiest 
Account deleted




i need something to eat v:
Private
Popstar



Nesta wrote:
autism wrote:
Nesta wrote:
rip me it's just 2 pages of the book
oh just 2 wow that's not a lot does it teach a lot although it's only 2 pages this seems like a very broad topic
the curriculum is a large part of the history of energy developments and hope it shaped society and how politics and justice and controversies and all of that is framing current debates and how the future is going to be D: but i sorta gotta understand the broad stuff + some examples at minimum, but at lest NIMBY was one of the important points we should know that is probably the easiest 
oh then that probably includes a lot of things to learn
your studies always sound super interesting i hope you enjoy them!
Private
Popstar



Nesta wrote:
i need something to eat v:
do you know what you'll eat yet!
GenderTeam
World Famous



no phone call was earlier than expected
Private
Popstar



GenderTeam wrote:
no phone call was earlier than expected
what was it about or was it something too personal to share !!!
Private
Living Legend



GenderTeam wrote:
no phone call was earlier than expected
hope phone call went okay!
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last