Melody wrote:
u gave me kind of a fucked up mental image tho bc the position i used to work focused on keeping the site secure for minors hhhh,, at least they incorporated the coppa law which meant that ppl under 13 couldn't talk on site but only focus on the collecting part of it. i wish more sites did that but it's only required by sites ran on usa based servers sadly
rottomilko wrote:
seeeee i would understand that pov if they weren't up to hiring minors. them asking minors for their full name and video footage.... is like. uh. not much better than hiring a convict imoMelody wrote:
I have mixed feelings about it. like i guess it's good for them to know who does such an important job for them... like so they know they don't give the task to a idk a convicted pedo or something. but the whole process with the video interview??? like that's paid work stuff. rottomilko wrote:
yea. like i deffo see why they need good reliable mods
but the whole process i basically a job interview for a (non payed) volunteer task
yea, i think it's wild. i used to b a volunteer mod for a site w active user count of ~5000 ppl and they never even asked my first name. volunteer modding isn't or at least isn't supposed to be that serious. it's different if u get paidyea. like i deffo see why they need good reliable mods
but the whole process i basically a job interview for a (non payed) volunteer task
u gave me kind of a fucked up mental image tho bc the position i used to work focused on keeping the site secure for minors hhhh,, at least they incorporated the coppa law which meant that ppl under 13 couldn't talk on site but only focus on the collecting part of it. i wish more sites did that but it's only required by sites ran on usa based servers sadly