Azriel wrote:
there is no winning
devilcake wrote:
yeah exactly i think with more activity u might have to be more rigid and strict with the rules bc otherwise ppl will riot bc they treat one case different than another oneAzriel wrote:
tho idk how those rules would be interpreted if we had the same problem gsm had (tho that problem would also be caused by bad mods and stuff ??? unlikely)
Yeah, idk there’s always gonna be a difference in how a site can be moded depending on activity, I fink since we’re smaller it’s easier for yall to judge on a case by case basisdevilcake wrote:
Also seems like since most of the old mods have left the rules are more like, if you do this in bad faith / to be mean /spread misinformation or whatever then it’s a rule break
yeah exactly like im not gonna timeout babel for editing my forum post .... Also seems like since most of the old mods have left the rules are more like, if you do this in bad faith / to be mean /spread misinformation or whatever then it’s a rule break
tho idk how those rules would be interpreted if we had the same problem gsm had (tho that problem would also be caused by bad mods and stuff ??? unlikely)
there is no winning



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


20