FT: Diamond Member Speculation! - Forum

Eifos
World famous

Eifos wrote:

Private
World famous

Ewelein wrote:

Private
World famous

Ewelein wrote:

Eifos wrote:

Great outfits !

Private
Living legend

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Claire wrote:
lol omg she didnt even buy it and went to a different server to complain lol wow

oh yes because that's forbidden!!!! right?

you first need to waste your money on dm before you have a reason the find the set unworthy??? if you buy dm, do you get a set with more (and more qualitative) items as we (people without dm) see? don't think so

oh and maybe she's complaining here because someone from this server chose this set

maaaaaybe

sherlock

Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

Stormzi
Karaoke star

Stormzi wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:
oh yes because that's forbidden!!!! right?

you first need to waste your money on dm before you have a reason the find the set unworthy??? if you buy dm, do you get a set with more (and more qualitative) items as we (people without dm) see? don't think so

oh and maybe she's complaining here because someone from this server chose this set

maaaaaybe

sherlock

Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

Deemxoxo
Youtube star

Deemxoxo wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:
oh yes because that's forbidden!!!! right?

you first need to waste your money on dm before you have a reason the find the set unworthy??? if you buy dm, do you get a set with more (and more qualitative) items as we (people without dm) see? don't think so

oh and maybe she's complaining here because someone from this server chose this set

maaaaaybe

sherlock

Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

Well, because I am? Is there something wrong with that? I'm not denying it? And because (as said earlier) people have the right to give their opinion and obviously I'm not the only one finding this set not worthy. I don't think a set with less than 6 items for DM is possible, except for the period when there was only one item per week.

Private
World famous

Claire wrote:

Stormzi wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:
oh and maybe she's complaining here because someone from this server chose this set

maaaaaybe

sherlock

Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

how many times does jess need to explain that the missing bonus set (which is a.... wait for it.... BONUS that we arent garunteed) was a mistake that was also kaj's fault?

Private
Living legend

Shadowjess wrote:

Stormzi wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:
oh and maybe she's complaining here because someone from this server chose this set

maaaaaybe

sherlock

Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

And I get that.
I informed Wish and Voldi (German) as soon as I had Kaj's message regarding the DM. I know Wish also put out a message also regarding there will be no bonus DM for me also to make people aware in advance.
The missing DM originally was our fault as we hadn't noticed. Kaj just didn't have enough time to set it.

Stormzi
Karaoke star

Stormzi wrote:

Claire wrote:

Stormzi wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:
Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

how many times does jess need to explain that the missing bonus set (which is a.... wait for it.... BONUS that we arent garunteed) was a mistake that was also kaj's fault?

I know!! I get it.

Private
World famous

Claire wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Stormzi wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:
Why do I get the feeling your Demi?

Actually you probably are as your the one kicking up a fuss on the Dutch server too.
I really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also. Kaj has already explained the miss-hap with the DM Bonus as none of us noticed that there was no sets allocated until yesterday.
It was a bad choice, the first in a few weeks since we took over the allocation.

(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

And I get that.
I informed Wish and Voldi (German) as soon as I had Kaj's message regarding the DM. I know Wish also put out a message also regarding there will be no bonus DM for me also to make people aware in advance.
@Claire The missing DM originally was our fault as we hadn't noticed. Kaj just didn't have enough time to set it.

my point is they have people they can complain to about it on their own server : /

Deemxoxo
Youtube star

Deemxoxo wrote:

Claire wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Stormzi wrote:
(This is my first time having DM since 2016, I’ve only been active a week now) but I think people are more upset now because of the bonusset situation. I now have to buy credits again to get those items. That just kinda sucks. Don’t want to attack anyone x

And I get that.
I informed Wish and Voldi (German) as soon as I had Kaj's message regarding the DM. I know Wish also put out a message also regarding there will be no bonus DM for me also to make people aware in advance.
@Claire The missing DM originally was our fault as we hadn't noticed. Kaj just didn't have enough time to set it.

my point is they have people they can complain to about it on their own server : /

People on my server didn't chose the set, so no????

Private
Living legend

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Claire wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:
And I get that.
I informed Wish and Voldi (German) as soon as I had Kaj's message regarding the DM. I know Wish also put out a message also regarding there will be no bonus DM for me also to make people aware in advance.
@Claire The missing DM originally was our fault as we hadn't noticed. Kaj just didn't have enough time to set it.

my point is they have people they can complain to about it on their own server : /

People on my server didn't chose the set, so no????

and as I quote
' really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also.'

Account deleted

wrote:
heillo jess since ur here could u pls open ur message hehe

Deemxoxo
Youtube star

Deemxoxo wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Claire wrote:
my point is they have people they can complain to about it on their own server : /

People on my server didn't chose the set, so no????

and as I quote
' really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also.'

And as I quote:
"And because (as said earlier) people have the right to give their opinion and obviously I'm not the only one finding this set not worthy. I don't think a set with less than 6 items for DM is possible, except for the period when there was only one item per week. "

Private
World famous

Claire wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

Deemxoxo wrote:
People on my server didn't chose the set, so no????

and as I quote
' really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also.'

And as I quote:
"And because (as said earlier) people have the right to give their opinion and obviously I'm not the only one finding this set not worthy. I don't think a set with less than 6 items for DM is possible, except for the period when there was only one item per week. "

ok you gave your opinion. thank you. you can go now.