Deemxoxo wrote:
Claire wrote:
your discussion skills are 10/10, really
Deemxoxo wrote:
"And because (as said earlier) people have the right to give their opinion and obviously I'm not the only one finding this set not worthy. I don't think a set with less than 6 items for DM is possible, except for the period when there was only one item per week. "
ok you gave your opinion. thank you. you can go now.Shadowjess wrote:
and as I quote
' really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also.'
And as I quote:and as I quote
' really don't understand why this is escalating so bad. There has been bad set choices in the past. In fact I'm sure we've also had sets with less items in the past also.'
"And because (as said earlier) people have the right to give their opinion and obviously I'm not the only one finding this set not worthy. I don't think a set with less than 6 items for DM is possible, except for the period when there was only one item per week. "