Somsoc wrote:ad0xa wrote:
About the design thing people are talking about tho.
I'm pretty sure it has A LOT to do with how known you are in general. Like how long you've been on the site and designed things regularly and stuff. And there's a good reason for why people vote on those kinds of people - bc we have tools that could fuck up VP.
And you can't just take anybody in bc they could make it really messy and annoying for all of VP if they decided to fuck us over.Â
So it has to do with:
1. Skill.
2. How known you are. / What repp you've got.Â
3. How regularly you design.Â
I can't talk for everyone but that's what went through my mind when I voted on people. And I think it's safe to assume a lot of people thought like that too. Bc it makes sense.Â
Not saying that those who didn't win ISN'T trustworthy. It's more of a case that maybe those who won are a bit more known. Bc there's a difference there.Â
I definitely do agree though. Unlike SMT or ET or other teams that can give away prizes, being a designer actually meant having the power to add stuff (designs) in game or coding anything they needed to. A power that could easily be abused, but definitely shouldn’t.Â
Sorry for bringing this up again.
Tbh I don't think it is bad that you bring it up again. If there generally is a feeling that the selection of new designers were unfair, it really needs to be discussed so it doesn't lead to people not trusting the team(s).