redistribution of items - Forum

Private
National star

devilcake wrote:
Thank you vp for not letting me post your own fucking items

Private
National star

devilcake wrote:

Shadowjess wrote:

devilcake wrote:
I don’t think it would really hurt anyone to release a small amount of some very low ig very old items locked in accounts that haven’t been active in like 5+ years

like don’t take it out of their wd but adding 5 more ig of items that are just rotting in someone who hasn’t been in since 2016s wd would just benefit the community I feel like

*thinks about unobtainable witch hat*

Which witch hat?

[img= width=106,height=58]blob:https://en.virtualpopstar.com/1f42fa40-6420-4a35-bd6b-b791f13370bf[/img] I have lost the link to it so I can’t actually check if there is any active users but from what I remember there was like 1-3 ig, the only active I could imagine having it is you 🤔

the other colors have been added later tho

ElaVampire
Popstar

ElaVampire wrote:

devilcake wrote:
I don’t think it would really hurt anyone to release a small amount of some very low ig very old items locked in accounts that haven’t been active in like 5+ years

like don’t take it out of their wd but adding 5 more ig of items that are just rotting in someone who hasn’t been in since 2016s wd would just benefit the community I feel like

*thinks about unobtainable witch hat*

Im thinking abt the draculaura parasol, only 1 ig...

Caprisun
International star

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

Private
World famous

Babel wrote:

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

Also same.
Gosupermodel actually also had an acitvity requirement, if people want to compare.

Private
National star

devilcake wrote:

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

Yeah this

and also considering we’re allowed to take peoples usernames after a certain amount of time that’s basically the same thing

Private
National star

devilcake wrote:

Effer wrote:

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

Also same.
Gosupermodel actually also had an acitvity requirement, if people want to compare.

Dying at them making the model appear as your sentient little pet who is sad you forgot her

Private
World famous

Babel wrote:

devilcake wrote:

Effer wrote:

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

Also same.
Gosupermodel actually also had an acitvity requirement, if people want to compare.

Dying at them making the model appear as your sentient little pet who is sad you forgot her

I like the "ikke fordi vi vil være onde" as an addition to them making the model sentient, because it really does seem to be an evil act to delete something with feeling from existence "to clean up."

Not logging in for 6 months in total does, however, also seem a little extreme.

ElaVampire
Popstar

ElaVampire wrote:

caprisun wrote:
i mean, on other sites ive had my acc removed because of inactivity even after spending money on it and you know what i did? just made a new acc and tried to get back where i was. idk, to me its not that big of a deal, especially if you get a warning email first!!! and im not talking people who have been inactive for like 1-2 years, im talking like 2015-2014

I've only seen like one person come back from 2016

Private
National star

devilcake wrote:
It has been brought to my attention that the hat is not 1-3 ig, though I’m fairly certain it was like 5 years ago hshshshshshs

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:
Good idea if there would be a warning thing issued to emails, then after a while like maybe another one,
THEN yes

like
make the people that own the accounts aware, or at least try. many sites have an inactivity thing that deletes the account so idk
also 5 years is a LOT

as long as the items will not be just raffled, but actually auctioned or a reward in comps?
I mean hell, this could solve the sets crisis that some teams had? get some items back in circulation, some that have low ig put them in auctions, some that are a bit higher in comps?
I don't know if I ever talked about it here but I always thought about this idea as it just seems to be a waste

Caprisun
International star

caprisun wrote:

Abby wrote:
Good idea if there would be a warning thing issued to emails, then after a while like maybe another one,
THEN yes

like
make the people that own the accounts aware, or at least try. many sites have an inactivity thing that deletes the account so idk
also 5 years is a LOT

as long as the items will not be just raffled, but actually auctioned or a reward in comps?
I mean hell, this could solve the sets crisis that some teams had? get some items back in circulation, some that have low ig put them in auctions, some that are a bit higher in comps?
I don't know if I ever talked about it here but I always thought about this idea as it just seems to be a waste

def agree with 2 warning emails!! and auctions and comps sound good to me, as long as the items get back in circulation i honestly dont really care HOW they get there

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

caprisun wrote:

Abby wrote:
Good idea if there would be a warning thing issued to emails, then after a while like maybe another one,
THEN yes

like
make the people that own the accounts aware, or at least try. many sites have an inactivity thing that deletes the account so idk
also 5 years is a LOT

as long as the items will not be just raffled, but actually auctioned or a reward in comps?
I mean hell, this could solve the sets crisis that some teams had? get some items back in circulation, some that have low ig put them in auctions, some that are a bit higher in comps?
I don't know if I ever talked about it here but I always thought about this idea as it just seems to be a waste

def agree with 2 warning emails!! and auctions and comps sound good to me, as long as the items get back in circulation i honestly dont really care HOW they get there

Yeah like send warning email being like - "heeeeey.... there's a new thing that will delete many accounts so either log in or lose it forever you have a month k BYE"
then 2 weeks later another one saying final warning u have 2 weeks left to sign in for it not to be deleted,
THEN idk maybe third one for the "oops say bye bye as it is YEETED" yeah
ofc written more professionally and proper and I'd try to format something rn actually but I am eating and playing wow do monke brain

and yeah as Jess stated it would be rlly unfair to just give em? also give em to just random ppl that enter and are too new and again the same will happen to the items, lost forever to people that well... yeah

need to make the new rule like, idk 3 years? some might say 2 or 1years of inactivity is enough but yeah

Private
Popstar

ouch wrote:
If its auctioned off I think the money should be sent to the person that owned them at least, even if they haven't been active in like 5 years

Caprisun
International star

caprisun wrote:

ouch wrote:
If its auctioned off I think the money should be sent to the person that owned them at least, even if they haven't been active in like 5 years

thats a good idea, since it would be gone into the void otherwise, and that way the inactive users cant get too upset since they still get the money for it!