Potsie wrote: He's my buddy. And he's a very good lay-outer. Or how do you call that? xd
Yup he's a good layouter (I don't think it matter how you write it we do understand it right?) That's also why he deserves to be in :3
The Dutch newsteam said that he was bad.
Well, our news team/paparazzi crew thinks he's good XD
Account deleted
wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Potsie wrote:
Introspection wrote: Yup he's a good layouter (I don't think it matter how you write it we do understand it right?) That's also why he deserves to be in :3
The Dutch newsteam said that he was bad.
Well, our news team/paparazzi crew thinks he's good XD
No offence, but the niveau of the dutch team is higher than yours.
Account deleted
wrote:
Bronze wrote:
Potsie wrote:
Introspection wrote: Yup he's a good layouter (I don't think it matter how you write it we do understand it right?) That's also why he deserves to be in :3
The Dutch newsteam said that he was bad.
They sais my article was stupid and boring, and my letter sucks.
That's really rude. You're good!
Account deleted
wrote: The Dutch NT is being unprofessional. You can't call someone's articles stupid.
Introspection wrote: Yup he's a good layouter (I don't think it matter how you write it we do understand it right?) That's also why he deserves to be in :3
The Dutch newsteam said that he was bad.
They sais my article was stupid and boring, and my letter sucks.
we didn't say that .__.
Account deleted
wrote:
Rochel wrote:
Bronze wrote:
Potsie wrote: The Dutch newsteam said that he was bad.
They sais my article was stupid and boring, and my letter sucks.