You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Kuunsirpale
Selling wd/Looking wl!!!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
22 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Search for Friends < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page:
conservative republicans
Private
Popstar



Rainstorm wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Rainstorm wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
The thing is, politics are intricate and any opinion should be decently defended and explained for it to fully show the nuances of it. Idk how down I am to that right now on the most clear of the cases. 
Right.....

Most conservatives would be able to pinpoint a few things that have in common but sure, nice cop-out
Most people on this website go like "I dislike x because y" and then I'm like no sorry that's a bad argumentative formula, your bloodline is weak. 
That's what you just did though

You said you're in favor of something without explaining it any further. How's what any better?
15
Posts: 2216
Date: 02-02-2020 19:49
Private
Popstar



Rainstorm wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Rainstorm wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
I am honest tho, but honesty is gradient. There's a lot of things my parents should morally know about my life which I don't tell them because I don't want to, they never ask about it and I never bring it up, so I don't lie I'm just not actively telling the truth. 
If you're withholding information when you're directly being asked about something, is that not a form of lying? It's not like I'm asking for your credit card information
But most of the time I'm not directly asked. 
I asked you directly though and you replied with "I like being shady ehuehuehuehe"
15
Posts: 2216
Date: 02-02-2020 19:50
Aske
Prince of Pop



Aske wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Simple topics that do not need explanations which I am conservative on is e.g.: In Norway, the conservative parties (ironically) decided to change the local groupings of areas in Norway, changing the counties (fylker) and the communes (kommuner), merging them against the will of the people - wasting a lot of money in the process without any good reasoning or plan behind it. So in that sense, wishing to preserve things as they previously were is conservative in the traditional meaning of the word. It would to some extent make sense to merge some of the areas given that they actually have been one previously with a common name used for both, but when you start to merge things that have no history being together or no name or anything .. then gross. The worst is perhaps Hedmark + Oppland = Innlandet. LMAO. Or Troms + Finnmark = Troms og Finnmark. 
i'll just randomly jump in and second this, can regionsreformen please burn
20
Posts: 13057
Date: 02-02-2020 19:52
Private
International star



wug wrote:
askr wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Simple topics that do not need explanations which I am conservative on is e.g.: In Norway, the conservative parties (ironically) decided to change the local groupings of areas in Norway, changing the counties (fylker) and the communes (kommuner), merging them against the will of the people - wasting a lot of money in the process without any good reasoning or plan behind it. So in that sense, wishing to preserve things as they previously were is conservative in the traditional meaning of the word. It would to some extent make sense to merge some of the areas given that they actually have been one previously with a common name used for both, but when you start to merge things that have no history being together or no name or anything .. then gross. The worst is perhaps Hedmark + Oppland = Innlandet. LMAO. Or Troms + Finnmark = Troms og Finnmark. 
i'll just randomly jump in and second this, can regionsreformen please burn
I'm 100% okay with Adger and Trøndelag being like they are now but like Viken?? Vestland?? Innlandet?? Stupid. Troms og Finnmark? Historieløst! 
19
Posts: 107811
Date: 02-02-2020 19:58
Aske
Prince of Pop



Aske wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
askr wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Simple topics that do not need explanations which I am conservative on is e.g.: In Norway, the conservative parties (ironically) decided to change the local groupings of areas in Norway, changing the counties (fylker) and the communes (kommuner), merging them against the will of the people - wasting a lot of money in the process without any good reasoning or plan behind it. So in that sense, wishing to preserve things as they previously were is conservative in the traditional meaning of the word. It would to some extent make sense to merge some of the areas given that they actually have been one previously with a common name used for both, but when you start to merge things that have no history being together or no name or anything .. then gross. The worst is perhaps Hedmark + Oppland = Innlandet. LMAO. Or Troms + Finnmark = Troms og Finnmark. 
i'll just randomly jump in and second this, can regionsreformen please burn
I'm 100% okay with Adger and Trøndelag being like they are now but like Viken?? Vestland?? Innlandet?? Stupid. Troms og Finnmark? Historieløst! 
it's a disgrace, i can't deal with vestland, i'm tempted to frese everytime i see it. and the fight finnmark put up, what even is democracy if they don't give a shit what the people think
20
Posts: 13057
Date: 02-02-2020 20:03
Private
Popstar



Rainstorm wrote:
15
Posts: 2216
Date: 02-02-2020 20:32
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page:
© 2024 Terms of Use