wrote:
I already mentioned this in a (now deleted) thread, but I feel like it's important that people know just how huge the gap is between the prizes (for the sake of preventing an argument, I left the item sets out of the equation since it's nearly impossible to determine their worth).
Number 1: Samsung Galaxy J5 (~$200), 500cr ($10), and a diamond of their choice (at least 400cr, which is around $8 )
Top 5: 500cr ($10), and a diamond of their choice (at least 400cr, which is around $8 )
Top 20: 50cr ($1)
Top 50: 10cr (20¢)
As you can see, this leaves a HUGE gap between the top 5, and the top 20:
Number 1: ~$220
Top 5: ~$20
Top 20: $1
Top 50: 20¢
I really think the phone needs to be removed from the equation. First off, the site sure seems to love putting an emphasis on how many children are on the site, only to turn around and give out a smartphone (something many parents don't want their children having until they're 16, let alone given to them from a stranger).
This becomes even more shady when you consider that Kaj/Kim has to have the child's address to send them their prize (I know they most likely have the best intentions, but it's something that would definitely concern me as a parent). Not only that, many phone plans charge extra to add a new phone to the line (especially a smartphone), which would wind up actually costing the winner money.
Replace it with a gift card (you can just PM the winner the code on the card), replace it with credits, whatever. I just really, really think giving away a phone (and such an expensive one at that) on a site that you claim to have oriented towards children is a bad idea.
*EDIT* If you want to protest the contest, I set up a thread here
*EDIT 1/1/17* TheLucyStone had a great idea that solves several issues while still allowing the phone to be a part of the prize!
I already mentioned this in a (now deleted) thread, but I feel like it's important that people know just how huge the gap is between the prizes (for the sake of preventing an argument, I left the item sets out of the equation since it's nearly impossible to determine their worth).
Number 1: Samsung Galaxy J5 (~$200), 500cr ($10), and a diamond of their choice (at least 400cr, which is around $8 )
Top 5: 500cr ($10), and a diamond of their choice (at least 400cr, which is around $8 )
Top 20: 50cr ($1)
Top 50: 10cr (20¢)
As you can see, this leaves a HUGE gap between the top 5, and the top 20:
Number 1: ~$220
Top 5: ~$20
Top 20: $1
Top 50: 20¢
I really think the phone needs to be removed from the equation. First off, the site sure seems to love putting an emphasis on how many children are on the site, only to turn around and give out a smartphone (something many parents don't want their children having until they're 16, let alone given to them from a stranger).
This becomes even more shady when you consider that Kaj/Kim has to have the child's address to send them their prize (I know they most likely have the best intentions, but it's something that would definitely concern me as a parent). Not only that, many phone plans charge extra to add a new phone to the line (especially a smartphone), which would wind up actually costing the winner money.
Replace it with a gift card (you can just PM the winner the code on the card), replace it with credits, whatever. I just really, really think giving away a phone (and such an expensive one at that) on a site that you claim to have oriented towards children is a bad idea.
*EDIT* If you want to protest the contest, I set up a thread here
*EDIT 1/1/17* TheLucyStone had a great idea that solves several issues while still allowing the phone to be a part of the prize!
TheLucyStone wrote:
I think there should be an option to convert the phone into its equivalent in credits. So whatever 200$ worth of credits is. There'd still be the gaps between everything, but at least the winner doesn't have to give out their location to get something. Or maybe an option to get 200$ in gift card, that'd be great.
I think there should be an option to convert the phone into its equivalent in credits. So whatever 200$ worth of credits is. There'd still be the gaps between everything, but at least the winner doesn't have to give out their location to get something. Or maybe an option to get 200$ in gift card, that'd be great.