Klavier wrote:
Lolinontot wrote:
I am not attacking, or atleast not trying to. I, again, am sorry if it seems that way.
The only part that I can see as attack, was me calling moss out where they said "or smart enough to ask" That's the part I got offended at because it has very little to do with being smart or not, I already have enough struggles with that, I don't need to be indirectly called stupid, it was probably just a bad choice of words on their part, but it still upset me.
And again with the unfair part, It's not directed at this thread in particular, calm down. It is more like directed towards the morality of limited codes as a whole. I just want everyone- both new and old to have a chance because I don't like the unfairdness of real life to follow into some fictional online game.
I also like that it's a hunt- I am not complaining about that. It's just the fact that It's difficult to find the information in time that bugs me. Nothing else.
If possible inactivity is a problem.
Then just make it so that those who are unactive for too long gets deleted and have their items go on auction or just out to random other people who don't have the items and want them like they do with people who have died. I've seen other websites do that so why can't this?
its not unfair. u just don't like being left out but ur gonna have to learn to live with it pal
Salem wrote:it shows up for everyone so imo sounds like you weren't sure what to look for, which is fine but just. own up to that instead of attacking the people who made the event like it's something they should take ownership for. code hunts have notoriously been more difficult than this one and this time around most people found it easier/more enjoyable what with both moss and lab being active in the thread and actually getting lots of hints.
also something you said earlier abt it being unfair is a bit ??? because really if people aren't active enough to know what to be looking for then it's pretty likely whatever they claim will end up stuck in their wardrobe unusable by others bc they lost interest. I definitely like the fact that it's an actual hunt and not a first come first served type of thing because it makes sense that those who know the most abt the site/have invested more time and understanding into it have a higher chance of getting the benefits of that so to speak.
also something you said earlier abt it being unfair is a bit ??? because really if people aren't active enough to know what to be looking for then it's pretty likely whatever they claim will end up stuck in their wardrobe unusable by others bc they lost interest. I definitely like the fact that it's an actual hunt and not a first come first served type of thing because it makes sense that those who know the most abt the site/have invested more time and understanding into it have a higher chance of getting the benefits of that so to speak.
I am not attacking, or atleast not trying to. I, again, am sorry if it seems that way.
The only part that I can see as attack, was me calling moss out where they said "or smart enough to ask" That's the part I got offended at because it has very little to do with being smart or not, I already have enough struggles with that, I don't need to be indirectly called stupid, it was probably just a bad choice of words on their part, but it still upset me.
And again with the unfair part, It's not directed at this thread in particular, calm down. It is more like directed towards the morality of limited codes as a whole. I just want everyone- both new and old to have a chance because I don't like the unfairdness of real life to follow into some fictional online game.
I also like that it's a hunt- I am not complaining about that. It's just the fact that It's difficult to find the information in time that bugs me. Nothing else.
If possible inactivity is a problem.
Then just make it so that those who are unactive for too long gets deleted and have their items go on auction or just out to random other people who don't have the items and want them like they do with people who have died. I've seen other websites do that so why can't this?