callum wrote:
but who started the discussion about 'poorly preduced' designs if i may ask
holographic wrote:
i understand ur only disqualifing c and pheathens wrote:
this went wrong like the last one did, more specific in the future
The problem is, people are to lazy to read properly before they respond and don't even realise what I'm saying + I already have a better concept for the next one (if I'm going to do it haha)this went wrong like the last one did, more specific in the future
but who started the discussion about 'poorly preduced' designs if i may ask