You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Have you check our social medias lately? We might have a surprise!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
did solitude
Account deleted




wrote:
Wheatley wrote:
Seigfried wrote:
i assume it was this one

Non-Constructive Criticism  
Virtual Popstar encourages suggestions to help improve the user experience. However, these suggestions should be constructive. It is not permitted to speak negatively of the site or its staff in the forums, shouts, etc. If you have a complaint or have a suggestion, it should either be passed on privately to the administration or moderators via the report function. 

i'm pretty sure saying 'please don't tell me to suck an std-infected dick' is less constructive criticism and more 'i shouldn't even have to say this'
sure
Date: 09-04-2017 21:24
Account deleted




wrote:
Claire wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
all she did was talk about the document she helped to create for Kim 
ONLY shared it with Jess today after making the forum

Jess said it was something that it wasn't and that's how Solitude "broke" the rules.
Dude, I practically begged for the document and she didn't give it to me, she really didn't share it with anyone who didn't work on it as far as I can tell. If she had posted it, I'd understand this ban. Right now? I don't get it because it's offsite and she didn't share it here, and I was told people cannot be punished for things off site.
Anyone who she showed it to had an opinion voiced in the document. It's why she created the Kik chat - to get more opinions from people to add and to get multiple agreements that the 4 people involved in the creation weren't butthurt or making it up. 
Exactly. Apparently it's a burn book -,- 
did anyone get banned for the burn book Tumblr? not as far as I know.
Date: 09-04-2017 21:24
Private
World Famous



BloomCissi wrote:
Did she really get banned only for that thread?There was nothing in that thread that could have been reasonable to ban her for.
20
Posts: 24822
Date: 09-04-2017 21:24
Private
National Star



legohouse wrote:
mmimousa wrote:
legohouse wrote:
You are allowed opinions but when it comes to writing things that aren't true and spreading it without others knowing it becomes treated as a burn book and those are always punished. At this point "documents" like this are treated as cyberbullying and they will not be allowed. It is not informative as that would be something with concrete facts and proof but instead people have taken it too far. 
did u mods even recieve it tho
like
did you read what it said
22 pages is pretty long
Yes we did see it and it was spread to others as well
18
Posts: 10311
Date: 09-04-2017 21:24
Monbebe
Youtube Star



Monbebe wrote:
legohouse wrote:
You are allowed opinions but when it comes to writing things that aren't true and spreading it without others knowing it becomes treated as a burn book and those are always punished. At this point "documents" like this are treated as cyberbullying and they will not be allowed. It is not informative as that would be something with concrete facts and proof but instead people have taken it too far. 

how do you know its not true

she said there was proof in the docs

dont ban me im just mad
18
Posts: 1392
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
Saudade wrote:
> im not longer gunna attack the mods

> mods; BITCH WAZ THAT AN ATTACK???? TAKE THIS ATTACK!!!!!*Bans*

LMAO
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25
Account deleted




wrote:
Seigfried wrote:
i assume it was this one

Non-Constructive Criticism  
Virtual Popstar encourages suggestions to help improve the user experience. However, these suggestions should be constructive. It is not permitted to speak negatively of the site or its staff in the forums, shouts, etc. If you have a complaint or have a suggestion, it should either be passed on privately to the administration or moderators via the report function. 
I was constructive, though.
the mods just don't like being told they suck at their job
(the ones in question in the document - not the new mods) 
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25
Account deleted




wrote:
legohouse wrote:
mmimousa wrote:
legohouse wrote:
You are allowed opinions but when it comes to writing things that aren't true and spreading it without others knowing it becomes treated as a burn book and those are always punished. At this point "documents" like this are treated as cyberbullying and they will not be allowed. It is not informative as that would be something with concrete facts and proof but instead people have taken it too far. 
did u mods even recieve it tho
like
did you read what it said
22 pages is pretty long
Yes we did see it and it was spread to others as well
did you read it?
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25
Account deleted




wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Claire wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
all she did was talk about the document she helped to create for Kim 
ONLY shared it with Jess today after making the forum

Jess said it was something that it wasn't and that's how Solitude "broke" the rules.
Dude, I practically begged for the document and she didn't give it to me, she really didn't share it with anyone who didn't work on it as far as I can tell. If she had posted it, I'd understand this ban. Right now? I don't get it because it's offsite and she didn't share it here, and I was told people cannot be punished for things off site.
Anyone who she showed it to had an opinion voiced in the document. It's why she created the Kik chat - to get more opinions from people to add and to get multiple agreements that the 4 people involved in the creation weren't butthurt or making it up. 
Exactly. Apparently it's a burn book -,- 
did anyone get banned for the burn book Tumblr? not as far as I know.

i think solitude actually ran that tumblr (unless you're talking about a different blog) but mods can't exactly do anything about offside behavior
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25 | Times changed: 1
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
@legohouse so them screenshots r fake?
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 09-04-2017 21:25
Monbebe
Youtube Star



Monbebe wrote:
heathens wrote:
@legohouse so them screenshots r fake?
18
Posts: 1392
Date: 09-04-2017 21:26
Private
National Star



legohouse wrote:
Monbebe wrote:
legohouse wrote:
You are allowed opinions but when it comes to writing things that aren't true and spreading it without others knowing it becomes treated as a burn book and those are always punished. At this point "documents" like this are treated as cyberbullying and they will not be allowed. It is not informative as that would be something with concrete facts and proof but instead people have taken it too far. 

how do you know its not true

she said there was proof in the docs

dont ban me im just mad
There is no proof. Just here say things. This is not ending and we will be having a talk about what's going on and what we are going to do to help this situation 
18
Posts: 10311
Date: 09-04-2017 21:26
Account deleted




wrote:
heathens wrote:
@legohouse so them screenshots r fake?
Date: 09-04-2017 21:26
Private
National Star



legohouse wrote:
heathens wrote:
@legohouse so them screenshots r fake?
Taken out of context without the real story 
18
Posts: 10311
Date: 09-04-2017 21:26
Account deleted




wrote:
Wheatley wrote:
nope, from what i've seen she literally just said that she was quitting because she didn't trust the mods/kim, explained why she didn't trust the mods, and then shared a few drawings that friends did for her

She clearly stated " I am not quitting or anything like that"
Date: 09-04-2017 21:26
This topic is closed.
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use