Zussi wrote:
But the vaccine HAS BEEN TESTED! it took a short time because it was a need,it was funded and there were a lot of volunteers to help and get tested.The best doctors worked on it.
Vogue wrote:
Therefore I find it irresponsible to try to subjugate an insufficiently tested vaccine to the entire population since we don't know anything about the long-term side effects of an enitrely new technique for vaccination (messenger RNA) which up to now has never been approved for humans. I would never take it, I would never recommend it, but each to their own.
Saudade wrote:
Anyone with a previous illness, old age, immune deficiency or anxiety of getting sick is welcome to take the vaccine. Keyword personal responsibility. But we must not ignore that it is harmless for the majority of the population an and that the reason for fear and panic lies in our media and politics - less from a scientific point of view.Vogue wrote:
That might be true.
I just wanted to correct her euphemistic post.
I think these side effects in no way out weigh how bad the effects of covid-19 can be, with side effects such as...deathThat might be true.
I just wanted to correct her euphemistic post.
Therefore I find it irresponsible to try to subjugate an insufficiently tested vaccine to the entire population since we don't know anything about the long-term side effects of an enitrely new technique for vaccination (messenger RNA) which up to now has never been approved for humans. I would never take it, I would never recommend it, but each to their own.
But the vaccine HAS BEEN TESTED! it took a short time because it was a need,it was funded and there were a lot of volunteers to help and get tested.The best doctors worked on it.