You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES I’m looking at you 🫵
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page:
how do we feel about this vp?
Private
World famous



Evey wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
www.ctvnews.ca/health/who-action-plan-on-alcohol-sparks-confusion-allegations-of-sexism-1.5477639
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
17
Posts: 8503
Date: 20-06-2021 01:06
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
www.ctvnews.ca/health/who-action-plan-on-alcohol-sparks-confusion-allegations-of-sexism-1.5477639
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 20-06-2021 01:07
Private
World famous



Evey wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
yeah i'm just questioning mentioning it at all, and like that, it just makes no sense
17
Posts: 8503
Date: 20-06-2021 01:08
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
www.ctvnews.ca/health/who-action-plan-on-alcohol-sparks-confusion-allegations-of-sexism-1.5477639
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
Men can’t cause fetal alcohol syndrome which I would argue is a worse thing than lowered sperm counts. One might argue that less sperm is a good thing actually lmfao. 
21
Posts: 55674
Date: 20-06-2021 01:09
Emmienem
International star



Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
^ from what i read on snopes, it's more to raise awareness than to ban
20
Posts: 5919
Date: 20-06-2021 01:09
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
hmm
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 20-06-2021 01:09
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Claire wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
Men can’t cause fetal alcohol syndrome which I would argue is a worse thing than lowered sperm counts. One might argue that less sperm is a good thing actually lmfao. 
survival of the fittest sperm 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 20-06-2021 01:10
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Saintal wrote:

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
^ from what i read on snopes, it's more to raise awareness than to ban
Does The Who even have the authority to ban shit lmfao 
21
Posts: 55674
Date: 20-06-2021 01:12
Private
World famous



Evey wrote:
Claire wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
just found that too, glad that the first source was wrong

still don't understand why "appropriate focus" should be directed towards women of childbearing age and not all men since their sperm count is lowered from alcohol drinking which the woman from twitter says further down in the article? weird to mention "women of child bearing age" at all then
Men can’t cause fetal alcohol syndrome which I would argue is a worse thing than lowered sperm counts. One might argue that less sperm is a good thing actually lmfao. 
hmm yeah, seems like a tricky issue to do anything about when the woman doesn't know about being pregnant but guess it's good to raise awareness anyway

guessing that WHO would say that less sperm is bad tho XD
17
Posts: 8503
Date: 20-06-2021 01:12
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Claire wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
^ from what i read on snopes, it's more to raise awareness than to ban
Does The Who even have the authority to ban shit lmfao 
I discussed it with my dad just now and we concluded no, they can only suggest things. They don't have authority at all. 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 20-06-2021 01:12
Emmienem
International star



Emmienem wrote:
Claire wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
it's important to note that this is nothing but a draft as well before we all go full on angry villagers with pitchforks 
^ from what i read on snopes, it's more to raise awareness than to ban
Does The Who even have the authority to ban shit lmfao 
now that i'm thinking about it,, i don't think so lmao 
20
Posts: 5919
Date: 20-06-2021 01:13
Private
World famous



Evey wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Claire wrote:
Emmienem wrote:
^ from what i read on snopes, it's more to raise awareness than to ban
Does The Who even have the authority to ban shit lmfao 
I discussed it with my dad just now and we concluded no, they can only suggest things. They don't have authority at all.
makes sense, but i guess they could conclude that a ban would be the best thing or something like that
17
Posts: 8503
Date: 20-06-2021 01:14
Emmienem
International star



Emmienem wrote:
thank god your brains are working when mine isn't lmao <3
20
Posts: 5919
Date: 20-06-2021 01:15
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Claire wrote:
Does The Who even have the authority to ban shit lmfao 
I discussed it with my dad just now and we concluded no, they can only suggest things. They don't have authority at all.
makes sense, but i guess they could conclude that a ban would be the best thing or something like that
So? They have no authority. 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 20-06-2021 01:15
Private
World famous



Evey wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Saintal wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
I discussed it with my dad just now and we concluded no, they can only suggest things. They don't have authority at all.
makes sense, but i guess they could conclude that a ban would be the best thing or something like that
So? They have no authority. 
just that their research can be used to make decisions but i don't believe anyone would do that anyway

i'm just rambling
17
Posts: 8503
Date: 20-06-2021 01:17
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page:
© 2024 Terms of Use