You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Hookup culture
Private
Princess of Pop



Arthema wrote:
Don't care much about it
it's not for me, but I don't mind or like... care? if others do it? if it fits them, hell yeah, if not? hell yeah
unless someone if trying to hook up with me again n again after I said no, this factor means nothing
17
Posts: 39182
Date: 23-10-2021 11:35
Koolaid
Popstar



Koolaid wrote:
i don't think it's empowering, i also don't think everything has to be empowering. honest to god, sometimes ur just horny.....

this weird obsession with labeling everything as empowering is weird. it's forcing people to find everything they do empowering bc otherwise they will feel the guilt that the thing they're doing is immoral or demeaning.
17
Posts: 14620
Date: 23-10-2021 11:45
Account deleted




wrote:
Koolaid wrote:
i don't think it's empowering, i also don't think everything has to be empowering. honest to god, sometimes ur just horny.....

this weird obsession with labeling everything as empowering is weird. it's forcing people to find everything they do empowering bc otherwise they will feel the guilt that the thing they're doing is immoral or demeaning.

liberal feminism in a nutshell
Date: 23-10-2021 11:52
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
it is literally beyond damaging. lowkey i feel like u can shag someone without being in a relationship. i just dont get why someone would wanna shag someone they dont know at all. but there again, its down to the individual 
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 23-10-2021 11:57
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
Koolaid wrote:
i don't think it's empowering, i also don't think everything has to be empowering. honest to god, sometimes ur just horny.....

this weird obsession with labeling everything as empowering is weird. it's forcing people to find everything they do empowering bc otherwise they will feel the guilt that the thing they're doing is immoral or demeaning.
agreed
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 23-10-2021 11:57
Private
National Star



kagura wrote:
just you do you, if you wanna hook up with random then do 
if you don't then don't 
14
Posts: 7616
Date: 23-10-2021 12:12
Private
World Famous



Versailles wrote:
Like altough one is ok with only hooking up because of sexual needs but not wanting relationship it's still hella risky and might b scary if you don't know the person. There's tons of bad ppl with shitty intentions, like you don't know if it's angry het man with hatred for girls/women who might be abusive etc.

So it's not something id call empowering. It's ok to own your sexuality and have needs but it can be damaging even for those who's ok with hookups, because you don't know the person and suddenly something happens that you're not ok with. 
20
Posts: 6859
Date: 23-10-2021 16:24
Alam
World Famous



Alam wrote:
It's literally none of my business what someone else does in their free time with another consenting adult. I don't care if it's damaging, if you're an adult, you know what you're doing, you can deal with the consequences. I don't think empowerment has anything to do with it though, not that the word has any meaning but yeh
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 23-10-2021 16:28 | Times changed: 1
Account deleted




wrote:
Not for me.
But as it is incredibly normal here and we got russetida where its like a big thing and ye - that in turn has resulted in people shaming ppl who don't like it, which is bad, but ppl do what they wanna. I don't have any issues w that. My only issue is ppl being shitty towards ppl who don't like it bc it's the "cool" thing to do. 
Otherwise, I don't have any opinions. 
Date: 23-10-2021 16:29
Private
National Star



Sylvan wrote:
Like I'm not against casual sex per se, but I at least need to know what their stance is on the star trek vs star wars debate and why.
16
Posts: 17933
Date: 23-10-2021 16:34
Private
Popstar



Melody wrote:
i personally don't support it but i'm also extremely monogamous (as in i would not be ok with my SO flirting/sleeping with others, nor would i seek for other peeps to engage with). i understand it's what non-committal peeps frequent tho. not sure which aspect of it should be viewed as empowering????? it's basically u lending ur body in exchange for someone else's body, and i think it sorta devalues your bod in that way like it was an item u'd put on a shelf, but it's just my opinion
19
Posts: 8632
Date: 23-10-2021 16:45
Alam
World Famous



Alam wrote:
brunhilde wrote:
i personally don't support it but i'm also extremely monogamous (as in i would not be ok with my SO flirting/sleeping with others, nor would i seek for other peeps to engage with). i understand it's what non-committal peeps frequent tho. not sure which aspect of it should be viewed as empowering????? it's basically u lending ur body in exchange for someone else's body, and i think it sorta devalues your bod in that way like it was an item u'd put on a shelf, but it's just my opinion
I don't think that is extreme by anyone's standard lol, that's just what monogamy means.
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 23-10-2021 16:48
Private
Popstar



Melody wrote:
Alam wrote:
brunhilde wrote:
i personally don't support it but i'm also extremely monogamous (as in i would not be ok with my SO flirting/sleeping with others, nor would i seek for other peeps to engage with). i understand it's what non-committal peeps frequent tho. not sure which aspect of it should be viewed as empowering????? it's basically u lending ur body in exchange for someone else's body, and i think it sorta devalues your bod in that way like it was an item u'd put on a shelf, but it's just my opinion
I don't think that is extreme by anyone's standard lol, that's just what monogamy means.
yea i mean i've heard some supposedly monogamous peeps still having "options" on the side and using tinder and whatnot, but maybe they're just cheaters idk
19
Posts: 8632
Date: 23-10-2021 16:51
Alam
World Famous



Alam wrote:
brunhilde wrote:
Alam wrote:
brunhilde wrote:
i personally don't support it but i'm also extremely monogamous (as in i would not be ok with my SO flirting/sleeping with others, nor would i seek for other peeps to engage with). i understand it's what non-committal peeps frequent tho. not sure which aspect of it should be viewed as empowering????? it's basically u lending ur body in exchange for someone else's body, and i think it sorta devalues your bod in that way like it was an item u'd put on a shelf, but it's just my opinion
I don't think that is extreme by anyone's standard lol, that's just what monogamy means.
yea i mean i've heard some supposedly monogamous peeps still having "options" on the side and using tinder and whatnot, but maybe they're just cheaters idk
Yes
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 23-10-2021 16:55
Hajime
National Star



Hajime wrote:
I support it a lot because it gives people freedom on enjoying themselves with others, without having to put themselves into commitment.
However, I absolutely HATE the sl*tshaming it comes with, despite men being supported for being "playboys" and having a high body count and "experience", while women lose their value, when they had lots of men.
Also most of the women I see talk about their s*xual experience do not get what they need, which is to finish. It seems like men enjoy hookup culture more than women.
Wish it came with less judging and more actually focusing on pleasuring ur partner as well, not only ur own needs.
18
Posts: 3088
Date: 23-10-2021 17:12
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use