You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
23 people died after taking coronavirus vacci
Eytys
Youtube Star



DUCKBOY wrote:
like if your point is that at that age most of them must be suffering, i can get it
but when you say that they're "a waste of money and take up space, + their life isn't worth it" you're just being a dickhead, full stop
u can say its an opinion, which it is, but it does not mean its a dickhead opinion
okay let's say you have a 95 old with no quality of life. Their brain is mush. Next to the person you have a 25 year old who has changes of surviving if they get the very expensive treatment. Who are you giving the money and the space in the hospital to?

That's decisions we have to make!
Alam
World Famous



ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Ok so, I don't think he meant KILL all old ppl, I think he meant that ppl over a certain age should not be priorotized over younger ppl, which makes 100% sense logically lol, ppl r just scared of other ppl dying even tho they r on their last days already
I mean yeah, I agree with that but that's not what he said, is it?
"sorry but people who are older than 75 when they die.. it's not sad it's about time "
"honestly i don't care if people don't agree with me on this, we need to stop with the all life is holy and sacred shit because honestly no"
Yes I don't understand ur point, the first one can b seen as written ironically/funnily harsher lol n second one is just straight forward, not all life is holy nor sacred, and it should not be saved at all costs
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Alam
World Famous



ouch wrote:
eytys wrote:
DUCKBOY wrote:
"Fact is, human beings have an obsession with eternal life. They are not ready to let go. I worked at a hospital and have seen people being 95 and kept alive even though they have no quality of life anymore. They take up space, they cost money and their life isn't worth it anymore. [...]"

? if its not for their worth, why mention it?
okay, yes my wording was bad there. The effort isn't worth it anymore, because the individual doesn't benefit. The individual will still suffer, no matter the effort made.
Yes + it shouldn't b controversial to say u can save money on old ppl n use it on younger ppl who can still contribute lol,,, das society for u lmao 
Awfully communist of you, Ouch. 
Private
Popstar



Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
I mean yeah, I agree with that but that's not what he said, is it?
"sorry but people who are older than 75 when they die.. it's not sad it's about time "
"honestly i don't care if people don't agree with me on this, we need to stop with the all life is holy and sacred shit because honestly no"
Yes I don't understand ur point, the first one can b seen as written ironically/funnily harsher lol n second one is just straight forward, not all life is holy nor sacred, and it should not be saved at all costs
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
Alam
World Famous



eytys wrote:
DUCKBOY wrote:
like if your point is that at that age most of them must be suffering, i can get it
but when you say that they're "a waste of money and take up space, + their life isn't worth it" you're just being a dickhead, full stop
u can say its an opinion, which it is, but it does not mean its a dickhead opinion
okay let's say you have a 95 old with no quality of life. Their brain is mush. Next to the person you have a 25 year old who has changes of surviving if they get the very expensive treatment. Who are you giving the money and the space in the hospital to?

That's decisions we have to make!
But that's not what the discussion is about.
Private
Popstar



Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
eytys wrote:
okay, yes my wording was bad there. The effort isn't worth it anymore, because the individual doesn't benefit. The individual will still suffer, no matter the effort made.
Yes + it shouldn't b controversial to say u can save money on old ppl n use it on younger ppl who can still contribute lol,,, das society for u lmao 
Awfully communist of you, Ouch. 
More like capitalist, saving money when I uwu kill all the old ppl n spending them on little worker bees instead uwuw
Private
National Star



eytys wrote:
DUCKBOY wrote:
like if your point is that at that age most of them must be suffering, i can get it
but when you say that they're "a waste of money and take up space, + their life isn't worth it" you're just being a dickhead, full stop
u can say its an opinion, which it is, but it does not mean its a dickhead opinion
okay let's say you have a 95 old with no quality of life. Their brain is mush. Next to the person you have a 25 year old who has changes of surviving if they get the very expensive treatment. Who are you giving the money and the space in the hospital to?

That's decisions we have to make!
please read what i said, literally just the first line.
Alam
World Famous



ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Yes I don't understand ur point, the first one can b seen as written ironically/funnily harsher lol n second one is just straight forward, not all life is holy nor sacred, and it should not be saved at all costs
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
Private
Popstar



Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
Honestly, im just gonna say it again, who fucking cares. This is a you problem I feel like
Private
National Star



Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
more like sugarcoating it to not make it look so fucked up
Eytys
Youtube Star



Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
I don't think anything is holy or sacred but the phrasing of that sentence makes it seem like the point is that some life is holy or sacred, as opposed to other lives.
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
All I am saying: Be careful who you are going to compare to nazis. I don't think it's necessary to bring that word into a discussion at all.
Private
Popstar



DUCKBOY wrote:
Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
more like sugarcoating it to not make it look so fucked up
How is it fucked up topriorotize younger ppl lol, u don't have unlimited resources here 
Persona
Streetmusician



Commander watching this thread unfold

Alam
World Famous



ouch wrote:
Alam wrote:
ouch wrote:
Ur reading way too much into it I think, from how I read it his point was just what I said, old ppl should not be priorotized 
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
Honestly, im just gonna say it again, who fucking cares. This is a you problem I feel like
Then why are you taking part in the debate? I think this is an interesting discussion that has the potential to teach me something so I'm taking part, I'm not trying to be the thought police.
Private
National Star



ouch wrote:
DUCKBOY wrote:
Alam wrote:
The fact that such a potentially radical and fucked up opinion is so open to interpretation, I'd say is also a point against the argument.
more like sugarcoating it to not make it look so fucked up
How is it fucked up topriorotize younger ppl lol, u don't have unlimited resources here 
trying to say that 75+ yo people should not even be alive anymore is fucked up lmao 
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last