You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
15 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
I have come to the realization
Private
Popstar



FreckIe wrote:
ouch wrote:
December wrote:
all of vp is proof mental illness exists so idk what you mean
Vp ppl r fuckd in the head I hate them all
what about you
Im the only person that exists which means im practically god and I decide, im not 
Private
Popstar



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
i'll watch some f1 memes instead now 
Ur so boring today but ig thats bcus my brain made u boring today cus only I exist 
Customary to reserve the term phonetics for the study of physical aspects of speech sounds . what Trubetzkoy described as "the study of the sounds of [Saussurean] parole" (Ladd, 2011: 348 ). 
No
Private
World Famous



Pavlov wrote:
FreckIe wrote:
ouch wrote:
Vp ppl r fuckd in the head I hate them all
what about you
ouch is the exception cus theyre the only person on vp with an iq over 200
dont they say that the higher the iq the more ur prone to depression
Pavlov
International Star



ouch wrote:
FreckIe wrote:
ouch wrote:
Vp ppl r fuckd in the head I hate them all
what about you
Im the only person that exists which means im practically god and I decide, im not 
i cringed
Private
Popstar



Pavlov wrote:
FreckIe wrote:
ouch wrote:
Vp ppl r fuckd in the head I hate them all
what about you
ouch is the exception cus theyre the only person on vp with an iq over 200
Im sorry to disappoint but im not even a certified genius, obvious by me being dumb 
Private
Popstar



Pavlov wrote:
ouch wrote:
FreckIe wrote:
what about you
Im the only person that exists which means im practically god and I decide, im not 
i cringed
Thats the point no
center of the universe n all
if u cringed, I just cringed at myself
Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Ur so boring today but ig thats bcus my brain made u boring today cus only I exist 
Customary to reserve the term phonetics for the study of physical aspects of speech sounds . what Trubetzkoy described as "the study of the sounds of [Saussurean] parole" (Ladd, 2011: 348 ). 
No
The JFH version of the segmental idealisation does represent a refinement of the IPA version, because it acknowledges the continuous variation of acoustic parameters (Ladd, 2011: 356). 
Private
Youtube Star



this feels awfully reminiscent of gunshot don't it
Private
Popstar



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Customary to reserve the term phonetics for the study of physical aspects of speech sounds . what Trubetzkoy described as "the study of the sounds of [Saussurean] parole" (Ladd, 2011: 348 ). 
No
The JFH version of the segmental idealisation does represent a refinement of the IPA version, because it acknowledges the continuous variation of acoustic parameters (Ladd, 2011: 356). 
No
Private
Popstar



Limbs wrote:
this feels awfully reminiscent of gunshot don't it
I talked to her n we don't agree on stuff so no
Account deleted




Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
No
The JFH version of the segmental idealisation does represent a refinement of the IPA version, because it acknowledges the continuous variation of acoustic parameters (Ladd, 2011: 356). 
No
Martinet recognises that the identification of the phones on which we base our theoretical definition of the phoneme is specific to a given language (Ladd, 2011: 253). 
Pavlov
International Star



Limbs wrote:
this feels awfully reminiscent of gunshot don't it
f gunshot
Private
Popstar



Doesn't every rat look like that
Private
Popstar



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
The JFH version of the segmental idealisation does represent a refinement of the IPA version, because it acknowledges the continuous variation of acoustic parameters (Ladd, 2011: 356). 
No
Martinet recognises that the identification of the phones on which we base our theoretical definition of the phoneme is specific to a given language (Ladd, 2011: 253). 
Why r u a christian rn, I hate that 
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last