Sylvan wrote:Claire wrote:Sylvan wrote:
honestly yeah, it is pretty standard here in germany to apply for a job and then just continue working for your old company when it didn't work out.
i'm learning a lot about labor rights in other parts of the world from this thread
i mean this happens also in america- but there are MANY companies that fire you when they find out you're looking for work elsewhere. the capitalist value would be that there is no purpose in continuing to nurture their relationship with a resource that wont be around for much longer. the common advice here is to keep your mouth SHUT if youre applying for new jobs. that's between you and the new job the old job does not need that information until you give them your two weeks notice. and many jobs will say 'well forget the two weeks you can end employment today'
Firing someone for applying for another job is actually illegal here.
There can be like clauses(?) in a contract that forbid you to work for a direct competitor for a very limited number of years AFTER quitting. It happens very rarely though and only in positions where the person could use their knowledge and directly apply it at the competitor's company.
So this is why Etjen's reaction seems a bit harsh to me. I am used to the 'it is harder to get rid of an employee because losing your job is a drastic thing and people should be protected from unethical terminations' laws here.
yea yea "noncompete clauses". interestingly enough- those arent always legal in america. doug had a contract that forbid him from working at another barbershop but that's not actually legal in illinois because doug is a tradesman and had to get licensure for his trade. but people who have higher positions at large companies don't get to work at competitors and like "steal industry knowlege" from the company they left.