You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
New blog, new outfits! Go check them and vote ♥
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
20 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
if u check the rules
Private
Popstar



Fuck that sentence structure whack 
Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Doesn't having a diagnosis help a lot of ppl too tho h, I think the autism shit was that she was uhhh not respectful abt it n it definately didn't seem like the only reason she was against it was cus nazis(??) Made the diagnosis plus she was like iddk, from what I remember "has anyone even been diagnosed with autism on vp" n disrespectful stuff to actual autistic ppl so idk, mby she didn't mean it liek that but it certainly didn't come out nice so its very understandable if it got consequences
It helps a lot of people, but if they're wrongly diagnosed for example (which sadly happens) their lives are possibly permanently suffering from it. For instance, I have a cousin who was diagnosed as mentally retarded (pretty much what the diagnosis was tbh) during the time period in Norway when they used a kind of test/sheet thing which resulted in a lot of false positives, they don't even know the full extent of it. With the diagnosis she has, which is incorrect I might add, the Norwegian state can and will likely interfere with her life if she gets pregnant, either by forced abortion (no joke) or forced adoption. Only because they meant that she was too slow to learn things and that the only explanation was that she was retarded (spoiler: she couldn't see until 4th grade and no one noticed it). 
Yes that do b seeming more like not liking ppl getting misdiagnosed and not liking the autism diagnosis spesifically
I think we should just give her the benefit of doubt here and assume that she is not on a mission to intentionally hurt other people. 
Account deleted




the way that some of you argue is very childish noah fence
Account deleted




Snusmumrikken wrote:
Nesta wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm sorry the truth is depressing. 
Bring on the existentialism 
Which is the only philosophical era which is adequate. 
It ok
Private
International Star



disintegration wrote:
i should prepare sources for my 24h essay on sept 23 but i'm so not in the mood after another passive agressive message from the docent help
How passive aggressive was it on a scale of 1 to 10 
Private
World Famous



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
It helps a lot of people, but if they're wrongly diagnosed for example (which sadly happens) their lives are possibly permanently suffering from it. For instance, I have a cousin who was diagnosed as mentally retarded (pretty much what the diagnosis was tbh) during the time period in Norway when they used a kind of test/sheet thing which resulted in a lot of false positives, they don't even know the full extent of it. With the diagnosis she has, which is incorrect I might add, the Norwegian state can and will likely interfere with her life if she gets pregnant, either by forced abortion (no joke) or forced adoption. Only because they meant that she was too slow to learn things and that the only explanation was that she was retarded (spoiler: she couldn't see until 4th grade and no one noticed it). 
Yes that do b seeming more like not liking ppl getting misdiagnosed and not liking the autism diagnosis spesifically
I think we should just give her the benefit of doubt here and assume that she is not on a mission to intentionally hurt other people. 
hurt people hurt people
Private
International Star



Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Yes that do b seeming more like not liking ppl getting misdiagnosed and not liking the autism diagnosis spesifically
I think we should just give her the benefit of doubt here and assume that she is not on a mission to intentionally hurt other people. 
hurt people hurt people
That's true 
Private
International Star



Nesta wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Nesta wrote:
Bring on the existentialism 
Which is the only philosophical era which is adequate. 
It ok
No it's the best
Pavlov
International Star



i like how people are straigth up interpreting me instead of just asking me
Private
World Famous



Pavlov wrote:
i like how people are straigth up interpreting me instead of just asking me
i literally did ask u tho
Account deleted




Pavlov wrote:
i like how people are straigth up interpreting me instead of just asking me
thas why i asked bro
Private
Popstar



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
It helps a lot of people, but if they're wrongly diagnosed for example (which sadly happens) their lives are possibly permanently suffering from it. For instance, I have a cousin who was diagnosed as mentally retarded (pretty much what the diagnosis was tbh) during the time period in Norway when they used a kind of test/sheet thing which resulted in a lot of false positives, they don't even know the full extent of it. With the diagnosis she has, which is incorrect I might add, the Norwegian state can and will likely interfere with her life if she gets pregnant, either by forced abortion (no joke) or forced adoption. Only because they meant that she was too slow to learn things and that the only explanation was that she was retarded (spoiler: she couldn't see until 4th grade and no one noticed it). 
Yes that do b seeming more like not liking ppl getting misdiagnosed and not liking the autism diagnosis spesifically
I think we should just give her the benefit of doubt here and assume that she is not on a mission to intentionally hurt other people. 
I don't care if its intentional or not tho, if shes not able to see why how shes portraying her message is wrong cus it hurts ppl, n shes never able to learn from her mistakes n make her point come across better and less hateful. Like, if its once, sure benefit of the doubt but if its over n over then u deserve consequences
Private
Popstar



Heaven wrote:
the way that some of you argue is very childish noah fence
@ me D:
Private
World Famous



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Yes that do b seeming more like not liking ppl getting misdiagnosed and not liking the autism diagnosis spesifically
I think we should just give her the benefit of doubt here and assume that she is not on a mission to intentionally hurt other people. 
I don't care if its intentional or not tho, if shes not able to see why how shes portraying her message is wrong cus it hurts ppl, n shes never able to learn from her mistakes n make her point come across better and less hateful. Like, if its once, sure benefit of the doubt but if its over n over then u deserve consequences
idk if i kept getting in trouble for talking about autism id stop talking about autism on vp
Account deleted




ouch wrote:
Heaven wrote:
the way that some of you argue is very childish noah fence
@ me D:
occasionally
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last