You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Have you check our social medias lately? We might have a surprise!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Anti-eugenics arguments
Pavlov
International Star



Barbarella wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway a pro eugenics argument could be that testing embryos for disease could help families who suffer in poverty who cant afford or have the time to take care of a child who needs special care, there are too many children already born with severe illnesses or special needs who should be prioritised before we let new ones be born
I doubt impoverished families would be the ones with access to those tests. 
american poverty is a death sentence anyway i live in norway
Aarada
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway a pro eugenics argument could be that testing embryos for disease could help families who suffer in poverty who cant afford or have the time to take care of a child who needs special care, there are too many children already born with severe illnesses or special needs who should be prioritised before we let new ones be born
Not bad but i need ANTI arguments not pro
can u be completely anti eugenics it seems like a very broad topic,

but obviously u shouldnt kill something that already lives thats unethical and u shouldnt force minorities to get castrated
How do you define a living being? Unborn child?
Account deleted




Aarada wrote:
disintegration wrote:
It's one of those things that sounds good if you don't think about it for more than 10 seconds...
Tell me why it's wrong. I asked for arguments

It's inhumane, also it's  stupid, genetic health doesn't determine what a person can do to better society, gives too much power to people and people are usually idiots, genetic health isn't the main factor when it comes to quality of life, would destroy variation and diversity which is the reason we as a species are still here, would raise stigma, lead to more narrow ideals, access to technology (? in combination with late stage capitalism???? good idea yes????) depending on social status of parents, puts pressure on parents, will for certain be abused by billionaires,etc etc etc

also, since you seem unable to:
letmegooglethat.com/?q=why+is+eugenics+a+bad+idea
Aarada
Youtube Star



INFP wrote:
that sounds ironic but im fr oof
Its understandable to want a healthy generation of children .
Pavlov
International Star



Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Not bad but i need ANTI arguments not pro
can u be completely anti eugenics it seems like a very broad topic,

but obviously u shouldnt kill something that already lives thats unethical and u shouldnt force minorities to get castrated
How do you define a living being? Unborn child?
no unborn children are cashews
Account deleted




Aarada wrote:
INFP wrote:
that sounds ironic but im fr oof
Its understandable to want a healthy generation of children .
not for the sake of it as a group but for the sake of each individual's wellbeing
Aarada
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
can u be completely anti eugenics it seems like a very broad topic,

but obviously u shouldnt kill something that already lives thats unethical and u shouldnt force minorities to get castrated
How do you define a living being? Unborn child?
no unborn children are cashews
you're ANTI abortion?
Pavlov
International Star



Aarada wrote:
INFP wrote:
that sounds ironic but im fr oof
Its understandable to want a healthy generation of children .
even if u remove genetic illnesses doesnt mean they will not become ill
Private
World Famous



Genetic diversity is vital to the health of any species. 
Pavlov
International Star



Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
How do you define a living being? Unborn child?
no unborn children are cashews
you're ANTI abortion?
what
Aarada
Youtube Star



INFP wrote:
Aarada wrote:
INFP wrote:
that sounds ironic but im fr oof
Its understandable to want a healthy generation of children .
not for the sake of it as a group but for the sake of each individual's wellbeing
Both are equally as important
Pavlov
International Star



Barbarella wrote:
Genetic diversity is vital to the health of any species. 
yea thats why we dont inbreed
Aarada
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
no unborn children are cashews
you're ANTI abortion?
what
Do you consider an unborn child as a living being?xD
Pavlov
International Star



Aarada wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Aarada wrote:
you're ANTI abortion?
what
Do you consider an unborn child as a living being?xD
well its technically living yes but it has no conscience
Aarada
Youtube Star



disintegration wrote:
Aarada wrote:
disintegration wrote:
It's one of those things that sounds good if you don't think about it for more than 10 seconds...
Tell me why it's wrong. I asked for arguments

It's inhumane, also it's  stupid, genetic health doesn't determine what a person can do to better society, gives too much power to people and people are usually idiots, genetic health isn't the main factor when it comes to quality of life, would destroy variation and diversity which is the reason we as a species are still here, would raise stigma, lead to more narrow ideals, access to technology (? in combination with late stage capitalism???? good idea yes????) depending on social status of parents, puts pressure on parents, will for certain be abused by billionaires,etc etc etc

also, since you seem unable to:
letmegooglethat.com/?q=why+is+eugenics+a+bad+idea
wat
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last