need someone to share memes i relate to with - Forum

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
am late to the party, but i hope u remember what i said about putting weight into people’s opinions @mada . the way snus thinks isn’t at all representative, logically speaking. the world is literally yours, and you are free to shape it however you want. following the stream isn’t always good, yes? i’m fully aware that steve jobs, bill gates n jeff bezos represent the minority, but they did well by going their own way. they shaped their paths that benefited them enough to achieve whatever goal they had set in mind, n they probably achieved way more than they could have imagened. following the stream is only the safest option. and i know that this is hypocritical coming from an intj, but sometimes risks aren’t at all that bad.

for humanity they haven't done good tho.

bill gates has, though

that's true. but, my communistic values really have issues with it nevertheless.

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
bill gates has, though

that's true. but, my communistic values really have issues with it nevertheless.

i’m fine w capitalism because i’m greedy lol

I'm greedy but not like that

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
i’m fine w capitalism because i’m greedy lol

I'm greedy but not like that

like how

my personal stuff isn't free real estate. in a purely capitalist society some people regardless of skills will be disadvantaged compared to people simply because of their name, the socioeconomic class they were born into. it's fundamentally wrong. the success of your parents should be 100% irrelevant for your own life. it's simply better for the greater good to erase that aspect entirely. i'm thinking communism in a sense where people are allowed to pursuit what they are actually able to, given that it benefits the collective - naturally, and that they shouldn't suffer from it. if an artist is incredibly good at their work, why on earth should they pursuit a career in a field they have no interest or skill or talent in? that's not beneficial at all.

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
like how

my personal stuff isn't free real estate. in a purely capitalist society some people regardless of skills will be disadvantaged compared to people simply because of their name, the socioeconomic class they were born into. it's fundamentally wrong. the success of your parents should be 100% irrelevant for your own life. it's simply better for the greater good to erase that aspect entirely. i'm thinking communism in a sense where people are allowed to pursuit what they are actually able to, given that it benefits the collective - naturally, and that they shouldn't suffer from it. if an artist is incredibly good at their work, why on earth should they pursuit a career in a field they have no interest or skill or talent in? that's not beneficial at all.

100% agree, yes. there’s big holes of flaws in both systems, n having a society built only on either of them is just doomed to become problematic. i think a mix would be good. it’s all about a balance after all, but humans are naturally self-centered so i doubt that this will happen.

No there are no holes in communism if I'm the leader.

Account deleted

wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
my personal stuff isn't free real estate. in a purely capitalist society some people regardless of skills will be disadvantaged compared to people simply because of their name, the socioeconomic class they were born into. it's fundamentally wrong. the success of your parents should be 100% irrelevant for your own life. it's simply better for the greater good to erase that aspect entirely. i'm thinking communism in a sense where people are allowed to pursuit what they are actually able to, given that it benefits the collective - naturally, and that they shouldn't suffer from it. if an artist is incredibly good at their work, why on earth should they pursuit a career in a field they have no interest or skill or talent in? that's not beneficial at all.

100% agree, yes. there’s big holes of flaws in both systems, n having a society built only on either of them is just doomed to become problematic. i think a mix would be good. it’s all about a balance after all, but humans are naturally self-centered so i doubt that this will happen.

No there are no holes in communism if I'm the leader.

Is this where your plan of world domination comes in

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Nesta wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
100% agree, yes. there’s big holes of flaws in both systems, n having a society built only on either of them is just doomed to become problematic. i think a mix would be good. it’s all about a balance after all, but humans are naturally self-centered so i doubt that this will happen.

No there are no holes in communism if I'm the leader.

Is this where your plan of world domination comes in

Yes

Private
International star

wug wrote:

Vuitton wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Vuitton wrote:
100% agree, yes. there’s big holes of flaws in both systems, n having a society built only on either of them is just doomed to become problematic. i think a mix would be good. it’s all about a balance after all, but humans are naturally self-centered so i doubt that this will happen.

No there are no holes in communism if I'm the leader.

you’re not going to be able to satisfy or make everyone happy, realistically.

That's not the goal either. It's literally impossible to make everyone happy.