You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Have you check our social medias lately? We might have a surprise!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
19 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Private
World Famous



Pavlov wrote:
Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
i honestly think they were just waiting for me to say some dumb shit so they could have an excuse to ban me forever
they have enough users they shouldnt have time for vendetta bans honestly
Callum
World Famous



Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
it's like, you either agree with the people's opinions on there or your banned - it's no inbetween 
Account deleted




Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
I dont actually follow anything to do with that website as I just have 0 interest, but going solely off this message alone I would have to agree. I dont understand why that particular message was means for banishment, unless they were just looking for any excuse to ban her. 
Account deleted




wafl wrote:
Bram wrote:
Claire wrote:
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
they are

they're literal 12 year olds (at least mentally) who think they're saving the world by banning people who disagree with them (even though they make perfect sense)

who's gonna tell them that being a piece of shit online doesn't change the fact that neogenders are...bullshit...? for example
bram this is not verry puppy/puppyself of you
um i identify as a demiqueer questioning autismgender today
Private
International Star



Bram wrote:
Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
they are

they're literal 12 year olds (at least mentally) who think they're saving the world by banning people who disagree with them (even though they make perfect sense)

who's gonna tell them that being a piece of shit online doesn't change the fact that neogenders are...bullshit...? for example
what really bothers me with neogenders is that it is so incredibly inefficient in language like it's not helpful at all, why isn't they/them sufficient!! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa fucking cunts 
Private
World Famous



Bram wrote:
Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
they are

they're literal 12 year olds (at least mentally) who think they're saving the world by banning people who disagree with them (even though they make perfect sense)

who's gonna tell them that being a piece of shit online doesn't change the fact that neogenders are...bullshit...? for example
i am genuinely concerned for the children that buy into the neogender stuff the real world gonna hit these kids real hard someday 
Pavlov
International Star



Claire wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Claire wrote:
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
i honestly think they were just waiting for me to say some dumb shit so they could have an excuse to ban me forever
they have enough users they shouldnt have time for vendetta bans honestly
lemme endulge in narcissism for a moment 
Account deleted




Bram wrote:
wafl wrote:
Bram wrote:
they are

they're literal 12 year olds (at least mentally) who think they're saving the world by banning people who disagree with them (even though they make perfect sense)

who's gonna tell them that being a piece of shit online doesn't change the fact that neogenders are...bullshit...? for example
bram this is not verry puppy/puppyself of you
um i identify as a demiqueer questioning autismgender today
you can literally put any two fancy sounding words together and it's probably a "real" gender

semigender
fluidgender
homeostasisgender
Account deleted




Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Claire wrote:
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
i honestly think they were just waiting for me to say some dumb shit so they could have an excuse to ban me forever
the only website i've been banned from is panfu 
panfu removed my ability to chat bc i filled in my real birthday ):
Private
International Star



callum wrote:
Claire wrote:
Photosynthesis wrote:
Even I think that's kinda ridiculous lol 
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
it's like, you either agree with the people's opinions on there or your banned - it's no inbetween 
basically you are with us or against us, love that mentality, so healthy 
Account deleted




Claire wrote:
Bram wrote:
Claire wrote:
to me- it looks like theyre moderating with a political agenda and not like within the constraints of any rules. like this is so solidly opinion based. whats your take. 
they are

they're literal 12 year olds (at least mentally) who think they're saving the world by banning people who disagree with them (even though they make perfect sense)

who's gonna tell them that being a piece of shit online doesn't change the fact that neogenders are...bullshit...? for example
i am genuinely concerned for the children that buy into the neogender stuff the real world gonna hit these kids real hard someday 
what do you mean my password doesn't acknowledge my he/him/she/it/zoinks/bonk/spunk/twink gender preference?
Account deleted




Bram wrote:
Bram wrote:
wafl wrote:
bram this is not verry puppy/puppyself of you
um i identify as a demiqueer questioning autismgender today
you can literally put any two fancy sounding words together and it's probably a "real" gender

semigender
fluidgender
homeostasisgender
henlo i am wafflegender
Callum
World Famous



what's worse is that people actually go to that site for education on those topics, they genuinely think that 
Account deleted




never thought that at 19 i'd spend most of my time cringing at 12 year old marxists and gendernazis but here i am
Private
International Star



wafl wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
i honestly think they were just waiting for me to say some dumb shit so they could have an excuse to ban me forever
the only website i've been banned from is panfu 
panfu removed my ability to chat bc i filled in my real birthday ):
i transformed into a mouse and asked who wanted to see my mouse which means the same as who wants to see my vagina in norwegian and i was instantly banned 
This topic is closed.
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last