You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Have you check our social medias lately? We might have a surprise!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
14 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
can people please stop typing
MasileinDE
International Star



Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
maybe this is the reason why there are so few people typed as intj, they just dont care
I've seen so many people type themselves intj though, so I don't know?
sometimes I feel like there's also a big hype around certain types, like a desirable type to achieve and then people just try to "be that", you know?
like as if one type of characteristics is better than the other, it's what you make out of it that decides if you're a good person or not or if you're fun to be around or not
yes, intj, infj and infp seems to be very popular, i think something is wrong with the tests, and people generally just seem to like throwing around these types when theyre typing their favorite celebrities, oh well, but you seem pretty smart, its very much possible, you being critical of something because its not able to be proven with concrete evidence over wanting to have your identity validated, would point to te being above fi, im still not concluding anything, but im curious now
honestly, I'm bored, so if you want to pick my brain for a little experiment, I'm open to it :d
like I do feel that many tests just don't really work a lot or well
I know I'm a very emotional person, I love my feelings, I love wallowing in them, I love experiencing them. There's nothing I enjoy more than when I'm really feeling down making sure I can seize the moment and really experience it by extending it furthermore. The same with sheer happiness. I'm a feelings junkee, I always want to be feeling stuff, I always want to relate to something. But never in my entire life have I taken a decision based on my emotions. I did look for outside reasons as to why following my emotions would be bad or good, but the decision in the end was always taken by carefully exploring the options and deciding the "logical sound" thing. Bonus points if it was the same outcome as if I had gone with my guts or let my feelings dictate my decisions, but if it didn't happen, then too bad, I'm sure I could find another opprtunity later on with better prognostics.

I just find it really sad that the way things are laid out, there is this "you're supposed to be like this" mentality. Maybe it's just linked to the hyper visuality we get on social media, and I think typeing celebrities certainly ties into that, considering for many people it's a person they look up to or someone they want to have similar people like them around.
Pavlov
International Star



MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:
I've seen so many people type themselves intj though, so I don't know?
sometimes I feel like there's also a big hype around certain types, like a desirable type to achieve and then people just try to "be that", you know?
like as if one type of characteristics is better than the other, it's what you make out of it that decides if you're a good person or not or if you're fun to be around or not
yes, intj, infj and infp seems to be very popular, i think something is wrong with the tests, and people generally just seem to like throwing around these types when theyre typing their favorite celebrities, oh well, but you seem pretty smart, its very much possible, you being critical of something because its not able to be proven with concrete evidence over wanting to have your identity validated, would point to te being above fi, im still not concluding anything, but im curious now
honestly, I'm bored, so if you want to pick my brain for a little experiment, I'm open to it
like I do feel that many tests just don't really work a lot or well
I know I'm a very emotional person, I love my feelings, I love wallowing in them, I love experiencing them. There's nothing I enjoy more than when I'm really feeling down making sure I can seize the moment and really experience it by extending it furthermore. The same with sheer happiness. I'm a feelings junkee, I always want to be feeling stuff, I always want to relate to something. But never in my entire life have I taken a decision based on my emotions. I did look for outside reasons as to why following my emotions would be bad or good, but the decision in the end was always taken by carefully exploring the options and deciding the "logical sound" thing. Bonus points if it was the same outcome as if I had gone with my guts or let my feelings dictate my decisions, but if it didn't happen, then too bad, I'm sure I could find another opprtunity later on with better prognostics.

I just find it really sad that the way things are laid out, there is this "you're supposed to be like this" mentality. Maybe it's just linked to the hyper visuality we get on social media, and I think typeing celebrities certainly ties into that, considering for many people it's a person they look up to or someone they want to have similar people like them around.
it makes sense that you got typed as both infj and intj, but honestly, i really think you might be an intj. the way you describe your emotions, that sounds like fi to me, and not fe. but you dont prioritise your feelings so being a thinker primarily makes sense, i cant say anything about your usage of ni and se though, you could look those functions up and see if you relate to them if you havent
MasileinDE
International Star



Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
yes, intj, infj and infp seems to be very popular, i think something is wrong with the tests, and people generally just seem to like throwing around these types when theyre typing their favorite celebrities, oh well, but you seem pretty smart, its very much possible, you being critical of something because its not able to be proven with concrete evidence over wanting to have your identity validated, would point to te being above fi, im still not concluding anything, but im curious now
honestly, I'm bored, so if you want to pick my brain for a little experiment, I'm open to it
like I do feel that many tests just don't really work a lot or well
I know I'm a very emotional person, I love my feelings, I love wallowing in them, I love experiencing them. There's nothing I enjoy more than when I'm really feeling down making sure I can seize the moment and really experience it by extending it furthermore. The same with sheer happiness. I'm a feelings junkee, I always want to be feeling stuff, I always want to relate to something. But never in my entire life have I taken a decision based on my emotions. I did look for outside reasons as to why following my emotions would be bad or good, but the decision in the end was always taken by carefully exploring the options and deciding the "logical sound" thing. Bonus points if it was the same outcome as if I had gone with my guts or let my feelings dictate my decisions, but if it didn't happen, then too bad, I'm sure I could find another opprtunity later on with better prognostics.

I just find it really sad that the way things are laid out, there is this "you're supposed to be like this" mentality. Maybe it's just linked to the hyper visuality we get on social media, and I think typeing celebrities certainly ties into that, considering for many people it's a person they look up to or someone they want to have similar people like them around.
it makes sense that you got typed as both infj and intj, but honestly, i really think you might be an intj. the way you describe your emotions, that sounds like fi to me, and not fe. but you dont prioritise your feelings so being a thinker primarily makes sense, i cant say anything about your usage of ni and se though, you could look those functions up and see if you relate to them if you havent

psychreel.com/the-mbti-cognitive-functions/
hm, reading up on these descriptions, I'd say si and ne
(definitely not ni, if I can't see logic in something or feel like I understand it, I refuse to accept it as fact or work with it - basically the whole reason why I failed physics. like I'm brilliant when it comes to optics, accoustics and electricity, but the other physics categories? too abstract for me, not working. also one of the main reasons I don't trust things like mbti, actually a lot of things from psycho-sciences or like astrology)
Private
Streetmusician



MasileinDE
International Star




according to www.typematchapp.com/cognitive-functions-quiz/
Pavlov
International Star



MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:
honestly, I'm bored, so if you want to pick my brain for a little experiment, I'm open to it
like I do feel that many tests just don't really work a lot or well
I know I'm a very emotional person, I love my feelings, I love wallowing in them, I love experiencing them. There's nothing I enjoy more than when I'm really feeling down making sure I can seize the moment and really experience it by extending it furthermore. The same with sheer happiness. I'm a feelings junkee, I always want to be feeling stuff, I always want to relate to something. But never in my entire life have I taken a decision based on my emotions. I did look for outside reasons as to why following my emotions would be bad or good, but the decision in the end was always taken by carefully exploring the options and deciding the "logical sound" thing. Bonus points if it was the same outcome as if I had gone with my guts or let my feelings dictate my decisions, but if it didn't happen, then too bad, I'm sure I could find another opprtunity later on with better prognostics.

I just find it really sad that the way things are laid out, there is this "you're supposed to be like this" mentality. Maybe it's just linked to the hyper visuality we get on social media, and I think typeing celebrities certainly ties into that, considering for many people it's a person they look up to or someone they want to have similar people like them around.
it makes sense that you got typed as both infj and intj, but honestly, i really think you might be an intj. the way you describe your emotions, that sounds like fi to me, and not fe. but you dont prioritise your feelings so being a thinker primarily makes sense, i cant say anything about your usage of ni and se though, you could look those functions up and see if you relate to them if you havent

psychreel.com/the-mbti-cognitive-functions/
hm, reading up on these descriptions, I'd say si and ne
(definitely not ni, if I can't see logic in something or feel like I understand it, I refuse to accept it as fact or work with it - basically the whole reason why I failed physics. like I'm brilliant when it comes to optics, accoustics and electricity, but the other physics categories? too abstract for me, not working. also one of the main reasons I don't trust things like mbti, actually a lot of things from psycho-sciences or like astrology)
istj then maybe, i have to be honest, i hadnt even thought of that, but its such a normal type, like what would a type like that even be doing on vp
MasileinDE
International Star



Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
it makes sense that you got typed as both infj and intj, but honestly, i really think you might be an intj. the way you describe your emotions, that sounds like fi to me, and not fe. but you dont prioritise your feelings so being a thinker primarily makes sense, i cant say anything about your usage of ni and se though, you could look those functions up and see if you relate to them if you havent

psychreel.com/the-mbti-cognitive-functions/
hm, reading up on these descriptions, I'd say si and ne
(definitely not ni, if I can't see logic in something or feel like I understand it, I refuse to accept it as fact or work with it - basically the whole reason why I failed physics. like I'm brilliant when it comes to optics, accoustics and electricity, but the other physics categories? too abstract for me, not working. also one of the main reasons I don't trust things like mbti, actually a lot of things from psycho-sciences or like astrology)
istj then maybe, i have to be honest, i hadnt even thought of that, but its such a normal type, like what would a type like that even be doing on vp
I mean, from a purely logical point, if they are the most abundant in humans, it'd be only logical that the chances of them being anywhere is higher than for other types just by the pure numbers of it
also, I think people are really taking very different things from VP and I am really only here because designing for it tethered me o the game and now it's the only thing and hobby I have that doesn't involve sitting at home all by myself and reading
Pavlov
International Star



MasileinDE wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
MasileinDE wrote:

psychreel.com/the-mbti-cognitive-functions/
hm, reading up on these descriptions, I'd say si and ne
(definitely not ni, if I can't see logic in something or feel like I understand it, I refuse to accept it as fact or work with it - basically the whole reason why I failed physics. like I'm brilliant when it comes to optics, accoustics and electricity, but the other physics categories? too abstract for me, not working. also one of the main reasons I don't trust things like mbti, actually a lot of things from psycho-sciences or like astrology)
istj then maybe, i have to be honest, i hadnt even thought of that, but its such a normal type, like what would a type like that even be doing on vp
I mean, from a purely logical point, if they are the most abundant in humans, it'd be only logical that the chances of them being anywhere is higher than for other types just by the pure numbers of it
also, I think people are really taking very different things from VP and I am really only here because designing for it tethered me o the game and now it's the only thing and hobby I have that doesn't involve sitting at home all by myself and reading
i bow down to your logic, yes its very true. u should design more for redacted instead so u can get paid though, no reason to waste ur talents here
Account deleted




i knew masilein would be a filthy istj 
Pavlov
International Star



huminahuminaawooga wrote:
i knew masilein would be a filthy istj 
please  theyre a valid istj, honorary te-dom
Account deleted




Pavlov wrote:
huminahuminaawooga wrote:
i knew masilein would be a filthy istj 
please  theyre a valid istj, honorary te-dom
what
Pavlov
International Star



Pavlov wrote:
huminahuminaawooga wrote:
i knew masilein would be a filthy istj 
please  theyre a valid istj, honorary te-dom
we shouldnt discriminate between te-doms and te-aux
Account deleted




Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
huminahuminaawooga wrote:
i knew masilein would be a filthy istj 
please  theyre a valid istj, honorary te-dom
we shouldnt discriminate between te-doms and te-aux
i disagree
Pavlov
International Star



huminahuminaawooga wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
please  theyre a valid istj, honorary te-dom
we shouldnt discriminate between te-doms and te-aux
i disagree
ur opinion is invalid
Account deleted




Pavlov wrote:
huminahuminaawooga wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
we shouldnt discriminate between te-doms and te-aux
i disagree
ur opinion is invalid
i'm the original mbti sperger here
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last