You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
12 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
LET'S TALK ABOUT ES
Private
National Star



Eostre wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
Eostre wrote:
when I was 13 I made Twilight clubs and competitions and bought the winners tops for 10 coins on gSm : )
I proudly wore the Team jacob shirt despite never having read the books.
haha, I think I was team Edward, I guess because I was more or less the follower of like whatever was canon in the books. I remember I had a club, it was called "Twilight - Vampires and Werewolfs" fucking hilarious 
ahaha
Idk why Taylor Lautner appealed to me back then lol
Private
Living Legend



hmm wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
hmm wrote:
bruh i wonder how parrot is living his life now lmao, 8 million and shit  oh to be parrot fr
I don't believe a word of that. I wouldn't buy that site for $8 
to be fair it did get quite popular, it's possibly the most successful forum-based dressup game.. allegedly i dunno
Was there ever any proof? Kaj could say he sold the site for 8 million too, though let's be honest that would probably be less believable xD 
Talent
World Famous



Libertas wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
it is lmao, I was mad upset over the ban to begin with cause was insanely silly n then the whole being in contact for month just to be told no super passive agressively lmaoo, truly something else
I've heard a lot about people being banned for really stupid reasons there. 
Can we start banning people for random stuff as well? 
like one of those forum games on old forums

Bans you for being too cute x3
Hmm
National Star



Eostre wrote:
hmm wrote:
Eostre wrote:
when I was 13 I made Twilight clubs and competitions and bought the winners tops for 10 coins on gSm : )
omg cute  when i was 13 i used to sell drawings on stardoll for items and money hdbbdhbd i also got in a lot of drama on stardoll facebook groups tho so i think the chaotic behaviour of everskies is a rite of passage for them. except times have changed and perhaps it'll take a bit longer to get them out of their .. eccentric phases
idk if it is longer or shorter but it is for sure more exposed and there's also large forces of conforming to popular believes going on with questioning being cancle culture, which obv. don't support critical thinking and relatively safely being able to theorize different stances 
the whole internet is infested with echo chambers unfortunately and everskies is one of em, very infuriating
Teabag
World Famous



hmm wrote:
Teabag wrote:
Mhmh nice now i can openly talk about the irony that ive been designing all weekend for es while waiting for my DT application to get approved ✋lool
me pls
Get that cash 💸💸
Private
National Star



Laboratory wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
it is lmao, I was mad upset over the ban to begin with cause was insanely silly n then the whole being in contact for month just to be told no super passive agressively lmaoo, truly something else
I've heard a lot about people being banned for really stupid reasons there. 
ooh yes
ohhhhhh yes.

half of vp has a banned for discrimination over there lmao
Account deleted




Libertas wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
it is lmao, I was mad upset over the ban to begin with cause was insanely silly n then the whole being in contact for month just to be told no super passive agressively lmaoo, truly something else
I've heard a lot about people being banned for really stupid reasons there. 
Can we start banning people for random stuff as well? 
if u fuck up the forum vibe first u can get ppl bannet per request : ) 
Laboratory
World Famous



Sylvan wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
did they ban you before the bird sold the website?
b4 yes
mayyyyyyybe they wouldn't ban you if you just made a new account with the management change and all
yeahhhhhhhhhhh Ive considered making an new acc soo often but knowing myself I wouldnt b able to help myself like build up a decent acc n get attached to my shit n then if they ever do figure out that I'm .. me then It'd b the whole thing over again n I cba lmao.. If I was 100p sure I could just lurk n not .. feel too attached to the acc then I prob would but I dont think im capable lmaoO
Private
World Famous



talent wrote:
everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies everskies
I like how libertas just quoted this entire thing, samesis
Private
Living Legend



Sylvan wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
I've heard a lot about people being banned for really stupid reasons there. 
ooh yes
ohhhhhh yes.

half of vp has a banned for discrimination over there lmao
AND people say we are harsh xD
Hmm
National Star



Clavicle wrote:
hmm wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
I don't believe a word of that. I wouldn't buy that site for $8 
to be fair it did get quite popular, it's possibly the most successful forum-based dressup game.. allegedly i dunno
Was there ever any proof? Kaj could say he sold the site for 8 million too, though let's be honest that would probably be less believable xD 
wbk kaj sold vp for 50 euros smh smh
Talent
World Famous



Misjel wrote:
talent wrote:
x
I like how libertas just quoted this entire thing, samesis
it was a rly important message it was not allowed to be stunted
Private
Living Legend



hmm wrote:
Clavicle wrote:
hmm wrote:
to be fair it did get quite popular, it's possibly the most successful forum-based dressup game.. allegedly i dunno
Was there ever any proof? Kaj could say he sold the site for 8 million too, though let's be honest that would probably be less believable xD 
wbk kaj sold vp for 50 euros smh smh
That's being generous xD
Private
Minister of Pop



talent wrote:
Misjel wrote:
talent wrote:
x
I like how libertas just quoted this entire thing, samesis
it was a rly important message it was not allowed to be stunted
I was too lazy to remove it, plz don't judge me <//3
Private
National Star



Clavicle wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
Laboratory wrote:
ooh yes
ohhhhhh yes.

half of vp has a banned for discrimination over there lmao
AND people say we are harsh xD
WHO says this, I think I got 1 warning (not this acc tho) and like 5 closed threads in 5 years on en vp
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last