23 people died after taking coronavirus vacci - Forum

Callum
World Famous

callum wrote:
if you take 25k ppl, aren’t people likely to die anyway within that group with or without a vaccine?

Private
International Star

wug wrote:

callum wrote:
if you take 25k ppl, aren’t people likely to die anyway within that group with or without a vaccine?

yes

Private
International Star

wug wrote:

Claire wrote:

Commander wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
It still sounds like you want people to die based on your stance on the vaccine.

I meant that anyone who wants the vaccine should get it.

he really think he clever lmao

Lol it still reads the same no matter how it's worded

Account deleted

wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm not going to discuss this any further because I'm already seen as Satan sharing the very vanilla part of my opinion so no thanks I'm going to back down from this one

I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

this is pretty much eugenics...

why do you assume old people don't contribute anymore tho?

I don't like throwing around those words but to assign value to a person based on their ability to 'contribute' to society is not only deeply against human nature but also restricted by what one thinks is a valid contribution to society - is it only those who have a job and contribute to economic growth?
What do you think makes a person worthless to a society?

Eytys
Youtube Star

eytys wrote:
FACT: vaccines inject the virus into your body
FACT: you can react to it a little
FACT: old people might react to it and due to their age won't be able to handle it

There is nothing unusual about it. Sure it sucks and I wish they would have not died but that's a compromise old people have be willing to take.

Private
International Star

wug wrote:

disintegration wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:
I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

this is pretty much eugenics...

why do you assume old people don't contribute anymore tho?

I don't like throwing around those words but to assign value to a person based on their ability to 'contribute' to society is not only deeply against human nature but also restricted by what one thinks is a valid contribution to society - is it only those who have a job and contribute to economic growth?
What do you think makes a person worthless to a society?

are you going to tell me that someone who lives in a home who doesn't even remember who they are contributes to society in a useful way (other than ensuring that some people get jobs to take care of them)

Alam
World Famous

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm not going to discuss this any further because I'm already seen as Satan sharing the very vanilla part of my opinion so no thanks I'm going to back down from this one

I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

Private
International Star

wug wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:
I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

Well it's on you for reading it in the worst possible way but I guess I'll just be silent then

Private
World Famous

Sofia wrote:

BunnyButts wrote:

disintegration wrote:
bro, they were like 85,at that age, getting upset or taking the stairs could kill you.

me now at 21

Late but I feel this

Eytys
Youtube Star

eytys wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:
I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

it's the train dilemma. Who are you going to save? there is no right and wrong.

Alam
World Famous

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

Well it's on you for reading it in the worst possible way but I guess I'll just be silent then

I read it as you said it, mate. What you said is pretty much the basis for Nazi eugenics.

Private
International Star

wug wrote:

eytys wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

it's the train dilemma. Who are you going to save? there is no right and wrong.

no sorry i'm a nazi for my stance it is what it is haha

Account deleted

wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:
I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

no one cares about who you are as an individual in this world, that's just how it is (speaking of being in society in general uwuwuwuwuuw we live in a society uwuwuw)

Private
Popstar

ouch wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

disintegration wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm not going to discuss this any further because I'm already seen as Satan sharing the very vanilla part of my opinion so no thanks I'm going to back down from this one

I mean the second one is acceptable in America but it's America after all so...

I'm just thinking like why would you want to keep people who aren't capable of contributing in society any more alive rather than those who have decades ahead of them.. seems like a waste of resources if you ask me, regardless of how cynical that opinion might seem.

Valid

Eytys
Youtube Star

eytys wrote:

Alam wrote:

Snusmumrikken wrote:

Alam wrote:
I hate to be that person but that is very much a Nazi way of viewing things.

Well it's on you for reading it in the worst possible way but I guess I'll just be silent then

I read it as you said it, mate. What you said is pretty much the basis for Nazi eugenics.

It really is not. The nazis killed people for no reason, because they didn't fit "the standard". They did not decide whom to save based on limited resources. I'd be really careful about who you gonna throw the nazi label at!