Snusmumrikken wrote:Limbs wrote:Snusmumrikken wrote:
i don't agree with the social concept of pretty like what's considered pretty now is no offence really ugly to me, it's really unnatural and disgusting i'm like ew : ) but ofc we have individual taste, but saying ugly doesn't exist is a lie.
so you're saying ugly is a personal opinion, then?
okay as it's obviously incredibly hard to understand what i'm saying i will rephrase it so my stance is clearer to everyone as it's boring to continue this discussion:
when i say "ugly" objectively exists, I don't mean that whatever defines ugly is objective, that's a subjective matter, but the existence of "ugly" cannot be debated, that is something objectively which we will never get past, someone will always fine someone else ugly no matter what.
furthermore, claiming objectively prettiness as i did, was about proportions and also things that are pretty much proved by maths, we do generally find it prettier if someone is proportional and when things are sensibly aligned. i.e. someone is more likely to be found ugly if there are visible differences between the lengths of arms, legs, eye size (then we are talking
visible and not the normal thing everyone* has), eyes being aligned so it isn't like one in the forehead and the other one next to the mouth like some kind of picasso drawing, you also have this thing were humans are more likely to find eyes aesthetically pleasing with a specific length between them, if they are too near or too far that's a bit odd. etc. I don't want to elaborate any further but to sum it up:
ugly exists, what ugly is is subjective.
Trueee