prostitution on camera = legal - Forum

Pavlov
International Star

Pavlov wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

uwu u just wanna lick those mens pussies dont u uwu

if youre over 18 if youre undre 18 then go to bed u fucking baby

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
they don't know if they are a pedophile because there are no real underage people.... only catfishes

it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

but they were gonna hurt a victim? the fact that they were catfished doesnt make a difference. there is still a would-be victim.

there are two ways to catch a predator:
- trick them into confessing
or
- let them assault someone and catch them during or after the act

which one would you prefer?

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

but they were gonna hurt a victim? the fact that they were catfished doesnt make a difference. there is still a would-be victim.

there are two ways to catch a predator:
- trick them into confessing
or
- let them assault someone and catch them during or after the act

which one would you prefer?

but you don't know that? maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. we can't just assume

btw somebody went into the house of somebody who was catfished and the guy ended up SHOOTING HIMSELF is that better?

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

Pavlov wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

uwu u just wanna lick those mens pussies dont u uwu

are you truying to make me sick to my stomach? if so, its working

Private
Youtube Star

Limbs wrote:
prostitution is legal here anyway ur point is moot

Callum
World Famous

callum wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
they don't know if they are a pedophile because there are no real underage people.... only catfishes

it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

girl???? u tripping with this one, they were under the impression they were meeting a child, that's bad enough that they went there with those intentions

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

but they were gonna hurt a victim? the fact that they were catfished doesnt make a difference. there is still a would-be victim.

there are two ways to catch a predator:
- trick them into confessing
or
- let them assault someone and catch them during or after the act

which one would you prefer?

but you don't know that? maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. we can't just assume

btw somebody went into the house of somebody who was catfished and the guy ended up SHOOTING HIMSELF is that better?

they literally dont assume tho? at least not actual police or feds. they dont act until they have enough evidence. if the convo is like "hey im 10 you wanna fuck" "yes" then thats enough evidence cause they said they wanted to fuck a 10 year old. case solved. man's a pedophile.

i dont even??? what the fuck does that even say. can someone translate stupid

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
but they were gonna hurt a victim? the fact that they were catfished doesnt make a difference. there is still a would-be victim.

there are two ways to catch a predator:
- trick them into confessing
or
- let them assault someone and catch them during or after the act

which one would you prefer?

but you don't know that? maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. we can't just assume

btw somebody went into the house of somebody who was catfished and the guy ended up SHOOTING HIMSELF is that better?

they literally dont assume tho? at least not actual police or feds. they dont act until they have enough evidence. if the convo is like "hey im 10 you wanna fuck" "yes" then thats enough evidence cause they said they wanted to fuck a 10 year old. case solved. man's a pedophile.

i dont even??? what the fuck does that even say. can someone translate stupid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8aHFL_BCq0

Private
International Star

Flamink wrote:

bones wrote:
anyway respect sex workers they've always existed and probably always will ✌️

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
but you don't know that? maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. we can't just assume

btw somebody went into the house of somebody who was catfished and the guy ended up SHOOTING HIMSELF is that better?

they literally dont assume tho? at least not actual police or feds. they dont act until they have enough evidence. if the convo is like "hey im 10 you wanna fuck" "yes" then thats enough evidence cause they said they wanted to fuck a 10 year old. case solved. man's a pedophile.

i dont even??? what the fuck does that even say. can someone translate stupid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8aHFL_BCq0

im not watching any videos, thank you

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

callum wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
it literally does not fucking matter because that person was gonna commit a crime if given the option. thats how that shit works. have you ever heard of undercover cops? that's literally how that shit works

i agree if somebody is caught with someone underage, throw them in jail. but baiting someone with a catfish? that's a victimless crime... i only care about the ones who actually hurt victims

girl???? u tripping with this one, they were under the impression they were meeting a child, that's bad enough that they went there with those intentions

i would agree if they were meeting a real underage person and not a catfish........... ... i don't really care about victimless crimes

and im not a mind reader. i dont know the intentions of anyone. some people dont even say sexual things maybe they are just immature and wants somebody to talk to ? maybe they have a mental disoder? like there can be so many reasons....

Account deleted

wrote:
they argue that they aren't being paid for sex but someone else is paying them to have sex, it's stupid and shouldn't be legal

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

Dracarys wrote:
they argue that they aren't being paid for sex but someone else is paying them to have sex, it's stupid and shouldn't be legal

how does that even make sense? either way they are getting paid to perform sexual acts on somebody else.. which is prostitution ...

Private
World Famous

remains wrote:
is everyone living in like 1974 cuz prostitute is an old and dehumanizing term just use sex worker

Private
Living Legend

Maxwell wrote:
If u ever try and shoot someone but misses, don worry bruvvas, just show em u missed. No victim? No crime! Free out ov jail card evrytime bby