You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Have you check our social medias lately? We might have a surprise!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Anti-eugenics arguments
Private
Youtube Star



Aarada wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway a pro eugenics argument could be that testing embryos for disease could help families who suffer in poverty who cant afford or have the time to take care of a child who needs special care, there are too many children already born with severe illnesses or special needs who should be prioritised before we let new ones be born
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
Aarada
Youtube Star



Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Limbs wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
i dont think many disagree with that
Pavlov
International Star



Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Limbs wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
how are u supposed to stop them u cant exactly sue someone for it
Aarada
Youtube Star



autism wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway a pro eugenics argument could be that testing embryos for disease could help families who suffer in poverty who cant afford or have the time to take care of a child who needs special care, there are too many children already born with severe illnesses or special needs who should be prioritised before we let new ones be born
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
if you can't afford to care for a child that need special care then that special care should be free 
do you know how expensive that is?
Private
Youtube Star



autism wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway a pro eugenics argument could be that testing embryos for disease could help families who suffer in poverty who cant afford or have the time to take care of a child who needs special care, there are too many children already born with severe illnesses or special needs who should be prioritised before we let new ones be born
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
if you can't afford to care for a child that need special care then that special care should be free 
that's a good point actually
Pavlov
International Star



Pavlov wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
how are u supposed to stop them u cant exactly sue someone for it
tbh it seems like its actually the people in this world who absolutely shouldnt have kids in the situation theyre in who get kids, because of lack of education probably and men
Private
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
how are u supposed to stop them u cant exactly sue someone for it
i'm...... not telling we should stop them i'm just saying you're a shitty person if you do that... 
Pavlov
International Star



Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Limbs wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
first u should start helping the kids who are already born tho
Private
Popstar



Aarada wrote:
autism wrote:
Limbs wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that needs special care you shouldn't have a child
if you can't afford to care for a child that need special care then that special care should be free 
do you know how expensive that is?
i don't care print more money then it isn't real anyways 
Aarada
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Limbs wrote:
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
how are u supposed to stop them u cant exactly sue someone for it
tbh it seems like its actually the people in this world who absolutely shouldnt have kids in the situation theyre in who get kids, because of lack of education probably and men
they know,just dont care/being selfish.
Pavlov
International Star



autism wrote:
Aarada wrote:
autism wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that need special care then that special care should be free 
do you know how expensive that is?
i don't care print more money then it isn't real anyways 
u obviously dont know how money works
Aarada
Youtube Star



autism wrote:
Aarada wrote:
autism wrote:
if you can't afford to care for a child that need special care then that special care should be free 
do you know how expensive that is?
i don't care print more money then it isn't real anyways 
Lol
We can solve pverty. Just by priting moremoney!!
Private
Youtube Star



Pavlov wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Aarada wrote:
Should the government decide on who can and who cant make babies?
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
first u should start helping the kids who are already born tho
ya obviously
i'm arguing against the point that people being able to abort based on embryo testing because they can't care for special needs kids would be good. that doesn't make sense to me because kids can get disabilities after birth that wouldn't have been seen in embryo testing, so those people having children is still irresponsible n aborting based on embryo testing doesn't make it ok
Pavlov
International Star



Limbs wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Limbs wrote:
no, people should, i'm saying in my personal opinion it's unethical to have children if you can't care for them
first u should start helping the kids who are already born tho
ya obviously
i'm arguing against the point that people being able to abort based on embryo testing because they can't care for special needs kids would be good. that doesn't make sense to me because kids can get disabilities after birth that wouldn't have been seen in embryo testing, so those people having children is still irresponsible n aborting based on embryo testing doesn't make it ok
yea but at least i am talking about severe birth defects and not just "oh there is a 40 percent chance that theyre gonna be born with a 2 cm shorter index finger"
Aarada
Youtube Star



7 pages and still no good anti arguments.Thanks for debating anyways 
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last