You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
New blog, new outfits! Go check them and vote ♥
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Trashposting
Alam
World Famous



Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
You might think I'm wearing an animal costume right now but does that mean that your "subjective personal perception" is correct? No. Because I'm not.
That's oddly specific and I now suspect that you are. Virtual popstar user Riddle is a furry confirmed.
If I was a furry don't you think I would just call it a fursuit instead of an animal costume?
You're not helping your case mate
Account deleted




Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
That's oddly specific and I now suspect that you are. Virtual popstar user Riddle is a furry confirmed.
If I was a furry don't you think I would just call it a fursuit instead of an animal costume?
You're not helping your case mate
It's always the damn furries....
Private
World Famous



This whole thread has gotten out of control
Riddle
Karaoke Star



xxpedrofangirlxx444 wrote:
Riddle wrote:
xxpedrofangirlxx444 wrote:
There is no correct
I'm not wearing an animal costume so it would be incorrect for you to assume that.
Logic = on life support
Answer this yes or no.

If  I assume that the person at my door is trying to break in but it just turned out to be the mailman. Does that mean my assumption about the guy behind the door was incorrect?
Private
Popstar



Riddle wrote:
xxpedrofangirlxx444 wrote:
Riddle wrote:
I'm not wearing an animal costume so it would be incorrect for you to assume that.
Logic = on life support
Answer this yes or no.

If  I assume that the person at my door is trying to break in but it just turned out to be the mailman. Does that mean my assumption about the guy behind the door was incorrect?
Its not assumptions when its based on what u actually write. Same as if the mailman was outside my house with a machete n knocking on the door. I could assume I should mby not open the door lmao, but uwuw mby he just wanted to bring me a machete as a gift 
Riddle
Karaoke Star



ouch wrote:
Riddle wrote:
xxpedrofangirlxx444 wrote:
Logic = on life support
Answer this yes or no.

If  I assume that the person at my door is trying to break in but it just turned out to be the mailman. Does that mean my assumption about the guy behind the door was incorrect?
Its not assumptions when its based on what u actually write. Same as if the mailman was outside my house with a machete n knocking on the door. I could assume I should mby not open the door lmao, but uwuw mby he just wanted to bring me a machete as a gift
If you assumed that mailman was a bad guy when in reality was just a good guy, your assumption would be incorrect yes.

I just think it's simple logic really.
Alam
World Famous



Riddle wrote:
ouch wrote:
Riddle wrote:
Answer this yes or no.

If  I assume that the person at my door is trying to break in but it just turned out to be the mailman. Does that mean my assumption about the guy behind the door was incorrect?
Its not assumptions when its based on what u actually write. Same as if the mailman was outside my house with a machete n knocking on the door. I could assume I should mby not open the door lmao, but uwuw mby he just wanted to bring me a machete as a gift
If you assumed that mailman was a bad guy when in reality was just a good guy, your assumption would be incorrect yes.

I just think it's simple logic really.
Oh my Gd did you even read what Ouch wrote?
Riddle
Karaoke Star



Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
ouch wrote:
Its not assumptions when its based on what u actually write. Same as if the mailman was outside my house with a machete n knocking on the door. I could assume I should mby not open the door lmao, but uwuw mby he just wanted to bring me a machete as a gift
If you assumed that mailman was a bad guy when in reality was just a good guy, your assumption would be incorrect yes.

I just think it's simple logic really.
Oh my Gd did you even read what Ouch wrote?
It's YOU who don't understand, not me. Stop trying to gaslight me every time I make a comment, please.
It's absolutely possible to have incorrect assumptions about things or people.
Alam
World Famous



Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
If you assumed that mailman was a bad guy when in reality was just a good guy, your assumption would be incorrect yes.

I just think it's simple logic really.
Oh my Gd did you even read what Ouch wrote?
It's YOU who don't understand, not me. Stop trying to gaslight me every time I make a comment, please.
It's absolutely possible to have incorrect assumptions about things or people.
But she's not assuming anything! She's forming an opinion based solely on the information YOU gave her, you absolute troglodyte.
Riddle
Karaoke Star



Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
Oh my Gd did you even read what Ouch wrote?
It's YOU who don't understand, not me. Stop trying to gaslight me every time I make a comment, please.
It's absolutely possible to have incorrect assumptions about things or people.
But she's not assuming anything! She's forming an opinion based solely on the information YOU gave her, you absolute troglodyte.
But she misreads "the information I give her". I just want to correct her opinion.
I'm sure you would want to do the same.
Private
Popstar



Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
It's YOU who don't understand, not me. Stop trying to gaslight me every time I make a comment, please.
It's absolutely possible to have incorrect assumptions about things or people.
But she's not assuming anything! She's forming an opinion based solely on the information YOU gave her, you absolute troglodyte.
But she misreads "the information I give her". I just want to correct her opinion.
I'm sure you would want to do the same.
You have not been misread or misunderstood in this thread, theres only ppl who disagree w ur opinions aj
Alam
World Famous



Riddle wrote:
Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
It's YOU who don't understand, not me. Stop trying to gaslight me every time I make a comment, please.
It's absolutely possible to have incorrect assumptions about things or people.
But she's not assuming anything! She's forming an opinion based solely on the information YOU gave her, you absolute troglodyte.
But she misreads "the information I give her". I just want to correct her opinion.
I'm sure you would want to do the same.
Did we ALL misread it? I don't see anyone here thinking any more highly of you than we do.
Riddle
Karaoke Star



Final. Just answer me this.

My avatar is wearing a red-ish hat. Your OPINION of my avatar might be that you don't see a hat. Or if you did it might have been a different color.

If we want to be honest with ourselves.
Can we just agree that my avatar is in fact wearing a hat?
Alam
World Famous



Riddle wrote:
Final. Just answer me this.

My avatar is wearing a red-ish hat. Your OPINION of my avatar might be that you don't see a hat. Or if you did it might have been a different color.

Can we just agree that my avatar is in fact wearing a hat?
You cannot possibly be this dense.
Private
Popstar



Alam wrote:
Riddle wrote:
Final. Just answer me this.

My avatar is wearing a red-ish hat. Your OPINION of my avatar might be that you don't see a hat. Or if you did it might have been a different color.

Can we just agree that my avatar is in fact wearing a hat?
You cannot possibly be this dense.
She just don't understand subjective vs objective, don't bully her
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last