wug wrote:
Fayy wrote:
Thephotoshopsurgeon on yt shows clear evidence of the proportions being the thing that matters.
I'm #blessed because pretty much everything on my body and face is proportional in that golden mean/average??? sense so yeah mathematically i'm incredibly 100%. visually however.. not so much
Snusmumrikken wrote:
when i say "ugly" objectively exists, I don't mean that whatever defines ugly is objective, that's a subjective matter, but the existence of "ugly" cannot be debated, that is something objectively which we will never get past, someone will always fine someone else ugly no matter what.
furthermore, claiming objectively prettiness as i did, was about proportions and also things that are pretty much proved by maths, we do generally find it prettier if someone is proportional and when things are sensibly aligned. i.e. someone is more likely to be found ugly if there are visible differences between the lengths of arms, legs, eye size (then we are talking visible and not the normal thing everyone* has), eyes being aligned so it isn't like one in the forehead and the other one next to the mouth like some kind of picasso drawing, you also have this thing were humans are more likely to find eyes aesthetically pleasing with a specific length between them, if they are too near or too far that's a bit odd. etc. I don't want to elaborate any further but to sum it up:
ugly exists, what ugly is is subjective.
TrueeeLimbs wrote:
so you're saying ugly is a personal opinion, then?
okay as it's obviously incredibly hard to understand what i'm saying i will rephrase it so my stance is clearer to everyone as it's boring to continue this discussion: so you're saying ugly is a personal opinion, then?
when i say "ugly" objectively exists, I don't mean that whatever defines ugly is objective, that's a subjective matter, but the existence of "ugly" cannot be debated, that is something objectively which we will never get past, someone will always fine someone else ugly no matter what.
furthermore, claiming objectively prettiness as i did, was about proportions and also things that are pretty much proved by maths, we do generally find it prettier if someone is proportional and when things are sensibly aligned. i.e. someone is more likely to be found ugly if there are visible differences between the lengths of arms, legs, eye size (then we are talking visible and not the normal thing everyone* has), eyes being aligned so it isn't like one in the forehead and the other one next to the mouth like some kind of picasso drawing, you also have this thing were humans are more likely to find eyes aesthetically pleasing with a specific length between them, if they are too near or too far that's a bit odd. etc. I don't want to elaborate any further but to sum it up:
ugly exists, what ugly is is subjective.
Thephotoshopsurgeon on yt shows clear evidence of the proportions being the thing that matters.