You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
New blog, new outfits! Go check them and vote ♥
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
20 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
If 16 year olds get voting right
GayVodka
National Star



ouch wrote:
Heaven wrote:
why (genuinely curious yes)
Give. Me one reason they should
chaos
Private
Popstar



Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
i'd vote rødt but also no i have ties with sv so i vote sv 
Idk how I lose more respect when soemone votes sv rather than rødt, but I do. Sv is the suckiest party after frp n krf mby 
no offence ouch, with all due respect, your opinions on politics are irrelevant to me
I just hate sv, extremely bad vibes, rødt is good
Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Utdatert wrote:
i would rather vote sv than rødt because i dont want communism
it's so right wing propaganda that rødt is communist like lmao lmaaaaaaaaao rødt and sv are almost identical on everything related to economics and not even nkp (literally norges kommunistiske parti) is straight up communist lol 
Yeah, th e problem is they call themselves communists but even if they were 100% pure communists, it doesn't hurt to vote for them cus they will never get big enough to like, take over, but what rødt has done since they got one stortingsrepresentant has been good, aka why I like that we have so many small parties 
then again what is the point in voting for them lmao. its literally the same as voting blank unless they go into regjering.
Private
Minister of Pop



Ah yes norwegian politics
Idk for what party id vote then, would have to look more into it
Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
ouch wrote:
Idk how I lose more respect when soemone votes sv rather than rødt, but I do. Sv is the suckiest party after frp n krf mby 
no offence ouch, with all due respect, your opinions on politics are irrelevant to me
I just hate sv, extremely bad vibes, rødt is good
but why tho they have a lot of good poltical meanings, especially for foreigners and also womens rights
Private
National Star



Snusmumrikken wrote:
absintjente wrote:
why not? 16 year olds are as much a part of the society as 18 year olds, many of them work and pay taxes and its kinda silly that they cant influence things that affect them, like infrastructural and school politics. the argument about them being "uneducated" about politics is moot, because there are plenty of grown ppl who know nothing about politics or administration. 
also the entire tax thing is such an irrelevant argument are you legit going to tell me that adults studying who don't have a part-time job shouldn't be allowed to vote because of what?? 
all arguments used against 16 y/os voting are just straight up flawed
no taxation without representation.

youre saying stuff ive never said, lmao. i dont think that u have to pay taxes to vote, and i dont understand how you could extrapolate that from what i vote. 
Account deleted




But let's face it. Many of the 16-year-olds would choose the party their parents choose or are particularly popular in school and around friends. Minors are particularly easy to manipulate... they often think too naive, many are immature in thinking, even though there might be some exceptions.

The result would be a without a doubt a high percentage for left-green-parties with communist ideas, gender and climate ideologies and the like, who sound quite nice, friendly and better imaginable for minors at first. Funnily enough, the age reduction for voting is also propagated by these parties.
Private
Popstar



Utdatert wrote:
ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
it's so right wing propaganda that rødt is communist like lmao lmaaaaaaaaao rødt and sv are almost identical on everything related to economics and not even nkp (literally norges kommunistiske parti) is straight up communist lol 
Yeah, th e problem is they call themselves communists but even if they were 100% pure communists, it doesn't hurt to vote for them cus they will never get big enough to like, take over, but what rødt has done since they got one stortingsrepresentant has been good, aka why I like that we have so many small parties 
then again what is the point in voting for them lmao. its literally the same as voting blank unless they go into regjering.
No lmaooo, its not the same at all, they can do stuff as long as they get stortingsrepresentant(er), as seen by what Bjørnar has done after he got in (finally). So to vote for them is good, even if they will never get big enough to get in control of the country, but the small parties still do a lot of important stuff. Like mdg for nature stuff, I would NEVER want them in control of the country, but voting them into stortinget is good for everyone
GayVodka
National Star



theyd vote whoever passed the vibe check
Private
Popstar



Utdatert wrote:
ouch wrote:
Utdatert wrote:
i disagree 110% with frp and høyre and would never in my right mind vote for them. Im ap all the way 
Ap goes right after sv on the sucky list 
does that mean you support frp  s:
.. what now, I said those were on the sucky list too, along w krf
Private
International Star



Vogue wrote:
But let's face it. Many of the 16-year-olds would choose the party their parents choose or are particularly popular in school and around friends. Minors are particularly easy to manipulate... they often think too naive, many are immature in thinking, even though there might be some exceptions.

The result would be a without a doubt a high percentage for left-green-parties with communist ideas, gender and climate ideologies and the like, who sound quite nice, friendly and better imaginable for minors at first. Funnily enough, the age reduction for voting is also propagated by these parties.
I truly believe they would not. Tbh I think they would rather vote something really opposite to their parents, just to be a rebel and piss them off..
Parasite
Princess of Pop



Utdatert wrote:
Vogue wrote:
But let's face it. Many of the 16-year-olds would choose the party their parents choose or are particularly popular in school and around friends. Minors are particularly easy to manipulate... they often think too naive, many are immature in thinking, even though there might be some exceptions.

The result would be a without a doubt a high percentage for left-green-parties with communist ideas, gender and climate ideologies and the like, who sound quite nice, friendly and better imaginable for minors at first. Funnily enough, the age reduction for voting is also propagated by these parties.
I truly believe they would not. Tbh I think they would rather vote something really opposite to their parents, just to be a rebel and piss them off..
You're both not wrong, it'd go either way. When I was 16 I would've trusted my parents on it lol.
GayVodka
National Star



Utdatert wrote:
Vogue wrote:
But let's face it. Many of the 16-year-olds would choose the party their parents choose or are particularly popular in school and around friends. Minors are particularly easy to manipulate... they often think too naive, many are immature in thinking, even though there might be some exceptions.

The result would be a without a doubt a high percentage for left-green-parties with communist ideas, gender and climate ideologies and the like, who sound quite nice, friendly and better imaginable for minors at first. Funnily enough, the age reduction for voting is also propagated by these parties.
I truly believe they would not. Tbh I think they would rather vote something really opposite to their parents, just to be a rebel and piss them off..
YES absolutely that actually sounds like what theyd do
Private
International Star



ouch wrote:
Utdatert wrote:
ouch wrote:
Yeah, th e problem is they call themselves communists but even if they were 100% pure communists, it doesn't hurt to vote for them cus they will never get big enough to like, take over, but what rødt has done since they got one stortingsrepresentant has been good, aka why I like that we have so many small parties 
then again what is the point in voting for them lmao. its literally the same as voting blank unless they go into regjering.
No lmaooo, its not the same at all, they can do stuff as long as they get stortingsrepresentant(er), as seen by what Bjørnar has done after he got in (finally). So to vote for them is good, even if they will never get big enough to get in control of the country, but the small parties still do a lot of important stuff. Like mdg for nature stuff, I would NEVER want them in control of the country, but voting them into stortinget is good for everyone
i agree with this but i still dont see the point, because the bigger parties usually work with the smaller parties, so you get "i pose og sekk".
Pavlov
International Star



Snusmumrikken wrote:
Utdatert wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
i'd vote rødt but also no i have ties with sv so i vote sv 
i would rather vote sv than rødt because i dont want communism
it's so right wing propaganda that rødt is communist like lmao lmaaaaaaaaao rødt and sv are almost identical on everything related to economics and not even nkp (literally norges kommunistiske parti) is straight up communist lol 
hasnt rødt called themself a communist party
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last