You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 New blog, new outfits! Go check them and vote ♥
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
15 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
minorities on twitter be like
Alam
World Famous



Alam wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Alam wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
If you're attracted to both sexes, you're bisexual. It doesn't matter if you like one sex more than the other one, or if you only want to date one sex. I'm not criticizing that, because that's on you and I respect that, I don't care.
You can not identify yourself into a label that does not describe you. If you only felt attraction for men, you'd be gay
You say you don't want to do the thing and then you do the thing. I know myself, I know my sexuality and I know that the label gay is most accurate for me to use in most if not all scenarios in which my sexuality is in question. I may be sexually attracted to some women or sometimes have romantic interest in a woman, but for many reasons I am not and probably won't ever be interested in doing anything with a woman.
Gay (referring, again, to men) means being attracted exclusively to other men. If you can feel attraction for the other sex, you're still bisexual. You can't identify in or out of your own sexuality. I totally respect that you do not want to have anything to do with a woman, it's your life. But if you're not exclusively attracted to other men, you can not just take the label
Watch me
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 23-07-2020 18:26
Account deleted




wrote:
Hajime wrote:
there are many labels that aren't necessary like demisexual or demiromantic because its like sexual attraction to someone u have a bond with, no ? like.. isn't that just falling in love is
this is kinda OT but now i must bring gender into it 

reminds me of xenogenders, at first i thought they were redundant but now it makes sense since it apparently helps neurodivergent ppl fit and understand gender better in their opinion
mayb the same goes for those labels who knos
Date: 23-07-2020 18:26
Hajime
National Star



Hajime wrote:
i think micro-labels are really harmful because it's just isn't necessary.. like not everyone needs to know to what specific kind of person ur attracted to sexually or romantically because thats no ones business but urs 
18
Posts: 3088
Date: 23-07-2020 18:27
Account deleted




wrote:
ouch wrote:
Heaven wrote:
ouch wrote:
The most sad combo yes but its fine 
tbh mfs be like *fuck someone* "ok but i dont like u sorry" 
Would honestly rather liv that life than liking someone who wants sex so u can't b with them cus im sex repulsive, lovthat fo me
no wait i do be having commitment im just confusing my issues with not wanting commitment when in reality i dont have a problem w it
now sex dunno i am neutral
Date: 23-07-2020 18:27
BEWAREARTEMIS
National Star



BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Alam wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Alam wrote:
You say you don't want to do the thing and then you do the thing. I know myself, I know my sexuality and I know that the label gay is most accurate for me to use in most if not all scenarios in which my sexuality is in question. I may be sexually attracted to some women or sometimes have romantic interest in a woman, but for many reasons I am not and probably won't ever be interested in doing anything with a woman.
Gay (referring, again, to men) means being attracted exclusively to other men. If you can feel attraction for the other sex, you're still bisexual. You can't identify in or out of your own sexuality. I totally respect that you do not want to have anything to do with a woman, it's your life. But if you're not exclusively attracted to other men, you can not just take the label
Watch me
People like you are the reason why no one takes same-sex attracted people seriously
15
Posts: 2206
Date: 23-07-2020 18:27
BEWAREARTEMIS
National Star



BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
But go on with your biphobia
15
Posts: 2206
Date: 23-07-2020 18:27
BEWAREARTEMIS
National Star



BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
And homophobia
15
Posts: 2206
Date: 23-07-2020 18:27
Hajime
National Star



Hajime wrote:
Heaven wrote:
Hajime wrote:
there are many labels that aren't necessary like demisexual or demiromantic because its like sexual attraction to someone u have a bond with, no ? like.. isn't that just falling in love is
this is kinda OT but now i must bring gender into it 

reminds me of xenogenders, at first i thought they were redundant but now it makes sense since it apparently helps neurodivergent ppl fit and understand gender better in their opinion
mayb the same goes for those labels who knos
im not entirely sure what xenogenders are i just know im non-binary but it seems like a lot to read on!
18
Posts: 3088
Date: 23-07-2020 18:28
Kit
National Star



Kit wrote:
Hajime wrote:
i think micro-labels are really harmful because it's just isn't necessary.. like not everyone needs to know to what specific kind of person ur attracted to sexually or romantically because thats no ones business but urs 
i don't understand how unnecessary = harmful
do you not need them ? ok no prob, then don't use em
for people that do use them, they're probably quite necessary to their sense of self ? 
i just don't see how they're harmful at all idgi
19
Posts: 12912
Date: 23-07-2020 18:28
Hajime
National Star



Hajime wrote:
Alam wrote:
Hajime wrote:
there are many labels that aren't necessary like demisexual or demiromantic because its like sexual attraction to someone u have a bond with, no ? like.. isn't that just falling in love is
I know, I don't get it either but I don't care.
okay..............
18
Posts: 3088
Date: 23-07-2020 18:28
Alam
World Famous



Alam wrote:
Hajime wrote:
i think micro-labels are really harmful because it's just isn't necessary.. like not everyone needs to know to what specific kind of person ur attracted to sexually or romantically because thats no ones business but urs 
Okay but why is it harmful though? Verdict's still out on what I think about micro-labels so please educate me.
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 23-07-2020 18:28
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Alam wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Gay (referring, again, to men) means being attracted exclusively to other men. If you can feel attraction for the other sex, you're still bisexual. You can't identify in or out of your own sexuality. I totally respect that you do not want to have anything to do with a woman, it's your life. But if you're not exclusively attracted to other men, you can not just take the label
Watch me
People like you are the reason why no one takes same-sex attracted people seriously
Bruh no, as long as he doesn't contradict himself (calling himself gay and then dating women) it doesn't matter at all what goes on inside his brain
16
Posts: 95669
Date: 23-07-2020 18:28
BEWAREARTEMIS
National Star



BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
ouch wrote:
BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
Alam wrote:
Watch me
People like you are the reason why no one takes same-sex attracted people seriously
Bruh no, as long as he doesn't contradict himself (calling himself gay and then dating women) it doesn't matter at all what goes on inside his brain
It does not matter. If he's bisexual, he's bisexual and period. Calling yourself something you're not is bullshit
15
Posts: 2206
Date: 23-07-2020 18:29
BEWAREARTEMIS
National Star



BEWAREARTEMIS wrote:
But ya'll are here defending our labels being redefined because you can not understand the ones that describe you, so whatever
15
Posts: 2206
Date: 23-07-2020 18:30 | Times changed: 1
Account deleted




wrote:
Hajime wrote:
Heaven wrote:
Hajime wrote:
there are many labels that aren't necessary like demisexual or demiromantic because its like sexual attraction to someone u have a bond with, no ? like.. isn't that just falling in love is
this is kinda OT but now i must bring gender into it 

reminds me of xenogenders, at first i thought they were redundant but now it makes sense since it apparently helps neurodivergent ppl fit and understand gender better in their opinion
mayb the same goes for those labels who knos
im not entirely sure what xenogenders are i just know im non-binary but it seems like a lot to read on!
one xenogender i can name off the top of my head is "catgender" bc those ppl r otherkins w cats or whatever.. i dont try to question it whatever floats their boat if it makes them happy and comfortable it ok
Date: 23-07-2020 18:30
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use