politics - Forum - Virtual Popstar

POPIU
Karaoke star

POPIU wrote:

Abby wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Abby wrote:
well if we're talking opinions I think you can't measure it like that 🤷‍♀️

why not?

humans aren't black and white, we're 50 shades of grey

i didn't have any problems giving myself a rating so i don't see why anyone else would

Private
World famous

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
Lmao I saw.. I think it was on that Frankie Boyle show that Rishi Sunak had been in the same room as two super young teenagers and they pointed out that you could tell that the two boys were like lol we are the alphas here and it's hilarious, like Sunak looks like he is about to be absolutely dragged by two 12 y/os

it's ridiculous the amount of people that said as soon as he was made PM that we need a general election was hilarious haha. his first speech someone was playing I Predict a Riot in the background haha xx

I think a new election would have been right from a neutral point of view, but it is nowhere in hell the tories would trigger a new general election when they would likely lose the power they have

well the thing is i doubt people will vote for them or Labour either so god knows what woudl happen xx

Private
International star

wug wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

POPIU wrote:
the question isn't "are you good or evil", it's rate your moral compass on a scale from 0 to 10 (10 being good, 0 being bad)

humans don't work like that and morality is not objective

you should re-read the question if you didn't understand it

if i were to tell you to "rate your physical appreciate on a scale from 0 to 10", you could absolutely give yourself a decent rating (even if you're not conventionally attractive) because it's based on your own perception

you should re-read what i said if you didn't understand it. the way you have this allows for a hypothetical scenario where a person says they are 10 on a moral scale while thinking that it's completely fine to marry an 8 year old girl

Private
International star

wug wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:
it's ridiculous the amount of people that said as soon as he was made PM that we need a general election was hilarious haha. his first speech someone was playing I Predict a Riot in the background haha xx

I think a new election would have been right from a neutral point of view, but it is nowhere in hell the tories would trigger a new general election when they would likely lose the power they have

well the thing is i doubt people will vote for them or Labour either so god knows what woudl happen xx

uk should become more like the rest of europe and have coalitions instead of one-party majority governments

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

Abby wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
i'm true neutral according to it, not because i ever answer a true neutral answer but because it's just chaos in all directions

lmao that's what's chaotic neutral's for
you are chaotic neutral, chaos incarnated

but i'm not chaotic, like i get a lot of lawful things as well

hmmmmmmmmm
might be true neutral after all

Private
World famous

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
I think a new election would have been right from a neutral point of view, but it is nowhere in hell the tories would trigger a new general election when they would likely lose the power they have

well the thing is i doubt people will vote for them or Labour either so god knows what woudl happen xx

uk should become more like the rest of europe and have coalitions instead of one-party majority governments

we did once that i remember my mum says theres been another one before but i don't think i was alive yet xx

Private
World famous

BloomCissi wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
I think a new election would have been right from a neutral point of view, but it is nowhere in hell the tories would trigger a new general election when they would likely lose the power they have

well the thing is i doubt people will vote for them or Labour either so god knows what woudl happen xx

uk should become more like the rest of europe and have coalitions instead of one-party majority governments

Well, that can't be done as long as the voting system looks like it does.

Private
International star

wug wrote:

BloomCissi wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:
well the thing is i doubt people will vote for them or Labour either so god knows what woudl happen xx

uk should become more like the rest of europe and have coalitions instead of one-party majority governments

Well, that can't be done as long as the voting system looks like it does.

that is true

Private
World famous

Babel wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

DeIure wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
Denmark?

Yeup. Still don't know what I'm gonna vote though, but I know right wing's off.

I think Denmark is the one Nordic country I don't have a clue when it comes to politics, but it's probably going to end up like Sweden did

We got a vegan party and some more normal ones on the left with the newer ones caring for the environment.

On the right we had a racist party for years, but they've done their job so badly that three new racist parties now exist (Paludan made one of them, but the party is banned this election due to signature fraud) and racist party new and racist party no taxes.

We also got a center party who don't want to work with any of the far-something parties.

If it ends like Sweden I'll be sad.

POPIU
Karaoke star

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:
humans don't work like that and morality is not objective

you should re-read the question if you didn't understand it

if i were to tell you to "rate your physical appreciate on a scale from 0 to 10", you could absolutely give yourself a decent rating (even if you're not conventionally attractive) because it's based on your own perception

you should re-read what i said if you didn't understand it. the way you have this allows for a hypothetical scenario where a person says they are 10 on a moral scale while thinking that it's completely fine to marry an 8 year old girl

like i said, the rating is based on YOUR OWN perception. you give yourself a high score if you consider yourself to be a moral person, low score if you consider yourself to be immoral

you're overthinking it and making it more complicated than it needs to be

Private
International star

wug wrote:

DeIure wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

DeIure wrote:
Yeup. Still don't know what I'm gonna vote though, but I know right wing's off.

I think Denmark is the one Nordic country I don't have a clue when it comes to politics, but it's probably going to end up like Sweden did

We got a vegan party and some more normal ones on the left with the newer ones caring for the environment.

On the right we had a racist party for years, but they've done their job so badly that three new racist parties now exist (Paludan made one of them, but the party is banned this election due to signature fraud) and racist party new and racist party no taxes.

We also got a center party who don't want to work with any of the far-something parties.

If it ends like Sweden I'll be sad.

I see

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

POPIU wrote:
you should re-read the question if you didn't understand it

if i were to tell you to "rate your physical appreciate on a scale from 0 to 10", you could absolutely give yourself a decent rating (even if you're not conventionally attractive) because it's based on your own perception

you should re-read what i said if you didn't understand it. the way you have this allows for a hypothetical scenario where a person says they are 10 on a moral scale while thinking that it's completely fine to marry an 8 year old girl

like i said, the rating is based on YOUR OWN perception. you give yourself a high score if you consider yourself to be a moral person, low score if you consider yourself to be immoral

you're overthinking it and making it more complicated than it needs to be

humans in a nutshell, fr

Private
World famous

BloomCissi wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

POPIU wrote:
you should re-read the question if you didn't understand it

if i were to tell you to "rate your physical appreciate on a scale from 0 to 10", you could absolutely give yourself a decent rating (even if you're not conventionally attractive) because it's based on your own perception

you should re-read what i said if you didn't understand it. the way you have this allows for a hypothetical scenario where a person says they are 10 on a moral scale while thinking that it's completely fine to marry an 8 year old girl

like i said, the rating is based on YOUR OWN perception. you give yourself a high score if you consider yourself to be a moral person, low score if you consider yourself to be immoral

you're overthinking it and making it more complicated than it needs to be

It's not interesting that way, since it's not comparable.

Private
International star

wug wrote:

POPIU wrote:

Klasifikovany wrote:

POPIU wrote:
you should re-read the question if you didn't understand it

if i were to tell you to "rate your physical appreciate on a scale from 0 to 10", you could absolutely give yourself a decent rating (even if you're not conventionally attractive) because it's based on your own perception

you should re-read what i said if you didn't understand it. the way you have this allows for a hypothetical scenario where a person says they are 10 on a moral scale while thinking that it's completely fine to marry an 8 year old girl

like i said, the rating is based on YOUR OWN perception. you give yourself a high score if you consider yourself to be a moral person, low score if you consider yourself to be immoral

you're overthinking it and making it more complicated than it needs to be

If you're going to be like this I'll change my rating to 10 based on private things and I will not elaborate either way

Private
World famous

Babel wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:

DeIure wrote:

AtlantaG1912 wrote:
it was ridiculous the who thing was a joke and it got us no where expect the country even worse a site then it was before and all the ones who voted to leave are now complaining xx

My favorite news from the UK has been the people angry about fast access to their favorite European countries not working anymore.

My best friend said this the other day when we go to spain next year, she has dual nationality passport as she her mum was from Belfast but her dad was from Galway which one is northern ireland and the other the republican of ireland so she might get straight through and i'm going to be stuck in the queue haha. She said she'll find the nearest bar while she waits for me haha xx

Hahaha. I hope it won't be too bad honestly. Last I read about it it was mostly because people hadn't really realized or understood the change yet, so they've hopefully streamlined it.