Persephone wrote:
anyways gon hit yall Norwegian speakers up if I ever decide to learn for real hehe
Snusmumrikken wrote:
grammar wise norwegian is quite stripepd? we don't have much difference and not many tenses and in general inflections. we do have the passive for verbs tho but it's pretty easy to explain (basically it has to be present or present-like and you just add -s on the infinite form of the verb)
er.. we don't inflect for person on verbs.
substantives are a bit more chaotic tho.
hmmmmm so like exact opposite of Turkish? I think it's really easy to write, spell and pronounce Turkish when you get just a bit familiar but the grammar is fucked for real Venuschat wrote:
well it depends on what type of language you start off with. Norwegian is problematic because we do really differentiate between about 18 vowel sounds and it does matter. We also have (for most dialects) quite a lot of retroflex sounds. and Norwegian has tone language tendencies but the difference isn't present in all dialects. phonologically speaking Norwegian is .. maybe problematic to some speakers. English natives will struggle with some consonant clusters while Russians likely won't. Snusmumrikken wrote:
norwegian is quite weird lol
do you think Norwegian is a hard language to learn? I find myself pretty good at pronunciation in the languages I learn but like grammar wise?????? am interestednorwegian is quite weird lol
grammar wise norwegian is quite stripepd? we don't have much difference and not many tenses and in general inflections. we do have the passive for verbs tho but it's pretty easy to explain (basically it has to be present or present-like and you just add -s on the infinite form of the verb)
er.. we don't inflect for person on verbs.
substantives are a bit more chaotic tho.
anyways gon hit yall Norwegian speakers up if I ever decide to learn for real hehe



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


20
why did she change it at such a young age lol like suddenly at 4 she was like nope that's not her name

