interesting... designing... - Forum

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
im not being a smartass for no reason, i have a reason. two reasons actually

well you have been very rude to me for no reason. i don't understand what you get out of it but you do you i guess

there are reasons for why im rude to you, if you can't see it i recommend doing some deep soul searching. i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really

what are the reasons? you've been rude to me on numerous occasions . i think it's sad if you get enjoyment out of being mean to people....

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
so hypothetically somebody could send in copyrighted content and then inform the content owner about it

if someone submitted copyrighted content only for vp to get in trouble they would actually be the one in trouble cause kaj made rules for that specific reason. the person submitting the copyrighted content is the one responsible for making sure the content they submit does not break any laws and if vp is in the hot seat, kaj is gonna point all blame on the submitter and defend his own innocence and vp itself would face only limited consequences

was that useful?

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
so hypothetically somebody could send in copyrighted content and then inform the content owner about it

if someone submitted copyrighted content only for vp to get in trouble they would actually be the one in trouble cause kaj made rules for that specific reason. the person submitting the copyrighted content is the one responsible for making sure the content they submit does not break any laws and if vp is in the hot seat, kaj is gonna point all blame on the submitter and defend his own innocence and vp itself would face only limited consequences

was that useful?

what would the "vp itself would face only limited consequences" be? i mean if the user to submitted the copyrighted content is the one to get the blame..

and wouldn't kaj be responsible because he has the option to make money of that or not allow it?

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
well you have been very rude to me for no reason. i don't understand what you get out of it but you do you i guess

there are reasons for why im rude to you, if you can't see it i recommend doing some deep soul searching. i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really

what are the reasons? you've been rude to me on numerous occasions . i think it's sad if you get enjoyment out of being mean to people....

like i said i dont get anything out of it. i dont enjoy being mean to people. i always try to be nice to people unless they say or do something for me to not want to be nice to them. i usually avoid the people i dont like. i consider myself a nice person, but i can be mean if i want to. i have definitely held back when it comes to you though. you make threads like this with no intent on actually listening or caring about what others are saying. you're only trying to stir up trouble. do you get enjoyment out of that? cause i cant see why that makes you any better than me

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
so hypothetically somebody could send in copyrighted content and then inform the content owner about it

if someone submitted copyrighted content only for vp to get in trouble they would actually be the one in trouble cause kaj made rules for that specific reason. the person submitting the copyrighted content is the one responsible for making sure the content they submit does not break any laws and if vp is in the hot seat, kaj is gonna point all blame on the submitter and defend his own innocence and vp itself would face only limited consequences

was that useful?

what would the "vp itself would face only limited consequences" be? i mean if the user to submitted the copyrighted content is the one to get the blame..

and wouldn't kaj be responsible because he has the option to make money of that or not allow it?

limited concequences meaning said copyrighted content being removed

because the rules state the submitter is responsible and he can defend his position by saying "i didnt know". also since he doesnt do any of the administrative stuff anymore he would probably blame whoever added it in to the game, which would be wishbone (nl), voldemort (de) or shadowjess (en)

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
there are reasons for why im rude to you, if you can't see it i recommend doing some deep soul searching. i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really

what are the reasons? you've been rude to me on numerous occasions . i think it's sad if you get enjoyment out of being mean to people....

like i said i dont get anything out of it. i dont enjoy being mean to people. i always try to be nice to people unless they say or do something for me to not want to be nice to them. i usually avoid the people i dont like. i consider myself a nice person, but i can be mean if i want to. i have definitely held back when it comes to you though. you make threads like this with no intent on actually listening or caring about what others are saying. you're only trying to stir up trouble. do you get enjoyment out of that? cause i cant see why that makes you any better than me

you said "i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really" almost in the same sentence. do you think it's fun to be rude to people? i don't understand why you say that i don't listen or care about what other have to say because if i didn't i wouldn't have made topics or talked about it... obviously.... and just because i don't agree with everything you have to say doesn't mean i don't listen. accept that everyone has different thoughts on things and you might not have as a big problem with me as you make it sound like you do...

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
if someone submitted copyrighted content only for vp to get in trouble they would actually be the one in trouble cause kaj made rules for that specific reason. the person submitting the copyrighted content is the one responsible for making sure the content they submit does not break any laws and if vp is in the hot seat, kaj is gonna point all blame on the submitter and defend his own innocence and vp itself would face only limited consequences

was that useful?

what would the "vp itself would face only limited consequences" be? i mean if the user to submitted the copyrighted content is the one to get the blame..

and wouldn't kaj be responsible because he has the option to make money of that or not allow it?

limited concequences meaning said copyrighted content being removed

because the rules state the submitter is responsible and he can defend his position by saying "i didnt know". also since he doesnt do any of the administrative stuff anymore he would probably blame whoever added it in to the game, which would be wishbone (nl), voldemort (de) or shadowjess (en)

sure but what about financial consequenses? if it can be proven that he made money of somebody elses copyrighed content won't there be any other consequenses for that other than "vp content being deleted from vp"

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:
what are the reasons? you've been rude to me on numerous occasions . i think it's sad if you get enjoyment out of being mean to people....

like i said i dont get anything out of it. i dont enjoy being mean to people. i always try to be nice to people unless they say or do something for me to not want to be nice to them. i usually avoid the people i dont like. i consider myself a nice person, but i can be mean if i want to. i have definitely held back when it comes to you though. you make threads like this with no intent on actually listening or caring about what others are saying. you're only trying to stir up trouble. do you get enjoyment out of that? cause i cant see why that makes you any better than me

you said "i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really" almost in the same sentence. do you think it's fun to be rude to people? i don't understand why you say that i don't listen or care about what other have to say because if i didn't i wouldn't have made topics or talked about it... obviously.... and just because i don't agree with everything you have to say doesn't mean i don't listen. accept that everyone has different thoughts on things and you might not have as a big problem with me as you make it sound like you do...

you dont listen because you only pick out the things that you can comment on and keep asking questions about. people keep saying the same things and asking questions to you and you never respond earnestly other than just stating the same thing over and over. making threads does not prove your point cause people make threads like this for the exact reason i pointed out. i accept that people have different thoughts and opinions than me. you're the one who doesn't. cause whenever someone disagrees with you you need to pick out every part on why that opinion is the wrong one instead of agreeing to disagree. i wouldnt have had a problem with you if not for your problematic behavior.

and i already said i dont enjoy being rude to people. i dont have to enjoy it to do it. you really misunderstood my "fun waste of time" part. but like i said, you pick at anything you can. i mean it's a fun waste of time cause i get to practice language, argumentation, and self control. and it wastes time. i dont care about you. if i did i'd just leave you in the dust like everyone else

Kino
Popstar

Kino wrote:
but yeah peace out i have work in the morning so it's sleepy time. see you later probably

Private
National star

Lemon wrote:

Azriel wrote:
is it the obama head

We have obama head?

Slave2Master
Streetmusician

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:

Slave2Master wrote:

River wrote:
like i said i dont get anything out of it. i dont enjoy being mean to people. i always try to be nice to people unless they say or do something for me to not want to be nice to them. i usually avoid the people i dont like. i consider myself a nice person, but i can be mean if i want to. i have definitely held back when it comes to you though. you make threads like this with no intent on actually listening or caring about what others are saying. you're only trying to stir up trouble. do you get enjoyment out of that? cause i cant see why that makes you any better than me

you said "i dont get anything out of it. it's just a fun waste of time really" almost in the same sentence. do you think it's fun to be rude to people? i don't understand why you say that i don't listen or care about what other have to say because if i didn't i wouldn't have made topics or talked about it... obviously.... and just because i don't agree with everything you have to say doesn't mean i don't listen. accept that everyone has different thoughts on things and you might not have as a big problem with me as you make it sound like you do...

you dont listen because you only pick out the things that you can comment on and keep asking questions about. people keep saying the same things and asking questions to you and you never respond earnestly other than just stating the same thing over and over. making threads does not prove your point cause people make threads like this for the exact reason i pointed out. i accept that people have different thoughts and opinions than me. you're the one who doesn't. cause whenever someone disagrees with you you need to pick out every part on why that opinion is the wrong one instead of agreeing to disagree. i wouldnt have had a problem with you if not for your problematic behavior.

and i already said i dont enjoy being rude to people. i dont have to enjoy it to do it. you really misunderstood my "fun waste of time" part. but like i said, you pick at anything you can. i mean it's a fun waste of time cause i get to practice language, argumentation, and self control. and it wastes time. i dont care about you. if i did i'd just leave you in the dust like everyone else

do you see me asking questions as me attacking people or what? the way discussions work is that you make your arguments/points and then you question the other person.. people do this as much with me as i do about them. it's like i make a thread "why do you like cats over dogs?" and then you come to my thread upset because i won't change my mind because others explained why they do prefer cats over dogs. you can talk to people without convincing them into changing their mind... we all have our opinions and belifes that are rooted in us and i do not jump into discussions with the intentions to change everybodys minds. thats unrealistic and essencially pointless and a bad way of thinking.

by the way you sure do talk alot to me for somebody who doesn't care about me.....