You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES I’m looking at you 🫵
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page:
i'm confused
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
It's... hmm.. not very many unique ones. 

It's -ly, -less? 
arguably also em- but that's probably not counted anymore because you don't have *barrass lol 


that's.. errr 4? 
what's the alleged 5th. ous in horrendously? .. well.............. no
ohhh right right! i was thinking of um,, occurrences even if the same one occurs twice? hmm
yeah a lot of the morphemes i can find is archaic so they aren't really treated as derivational on a basic level because speakers have 0 intuitions about it basically 
right, i see 
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 16-10-2020 01:44
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Limbs wrote:
ohhh right right! i was thinking of um,, occurrences even if the same one occurs twice? hmm
yeah a lot of the morphemes i can find is archaic so they aren't really treated as derivational on a basic level because speakers have 0 intuitions about it basically 
right, i see 
but it's not specified for unique derivational elements or?
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 16-10-2020 01:45
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
yeah a lot of the morphemes i can find is archaic so they aren't really treated as derivational on a basic level because speakers have 0 intuitions about it basically 
right, i see 
but it's not specified for unique derivational elements or?
no, what's in the screenshot is all there was to it
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 16-10-2020 02:16
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Limbs wrote:
right, i see 
but it's not specified for unique derivational elements or?
no, what's in the screenshot is all there was to it
gotta love vagueness like that oof 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 16-10-2020 02:16
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page:
© 2024 Terms of Use