Private
Private
Private
0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.
wrote:
I consider it negligent and euphemistic to transfer that to the vaccine. Especially since more than half of the population is supposed to be vaccinated in order to achieve alleged herd immunity. We are dealing with a new technique of vaccine that has never been approved to date and for which no data on long-term side effects are available. All other vaccines meet this requirement and take years to develop and get approved. And even then people still die, get sick from the consequences of the vaccination. What would it look like with this vaccine? I don't want to imagine that and I think it's deeply irresponsible!
Since when do you have to vaccinate every1 for a flu? Why if it has been shown to be harmless to the great majority (Corona, 99% survival rate))? Isn't it enough just to "protect" the vulnerable groups with vaccination? What is happening here right now?
And by the way, I don't see myself in any of those positions. I don't take any medication and have not for more than 5 years.
MasileinDE wrote:
I don't get people with their "there's no long time data" stance.
The second we get long term data of any medication, it gets taken off the market, because it proves to be quite bad. Or it stays on and people keep taking it like bonbons despite them being known to destroy your organs.
There's a shitton of medication that scientists don't even invest time and money for real long term studies.
If you're worried about there not being a long-term study but you take other medication of ANY kind, you're either a hypocrite or just utterly uneducated. Pick your poison.
Medication are always toxic in excess and when taken daily or often. Many use it to suppress symptoms until their body can no longer cope with that either and more severe illness or even death occurs. We actually know that people die as a result of taking those drugs, and in great numbers. Day by day. The doctors themselves know that, but no consequence has been draw neither by them or the government. It seems to be downright suppressed and glossed over. Keyword pharmaceutical industry...I don't get people with their "there's no long time data" stance.
The second we get long term data of any medication, it gets taken off the market, because it proves to be quite bad. Or it stays on and people keep taking it like bonbons despite them being known to destroy your organs.
There's a shitton of medication that scientists don't even invest time and money for real long term studies.
If you're worried about there not being a long-term study but you take other medication of ANY kind, you're either a hypocrite or just utterly uneducated. Pick your poison.
I consider it negligent and euphemistic to transfer that to the vaccine. Especially since more than half of the population is supposed to be vaccinated in order to achieve alleged herd immunity. We are dealing with a new technique of vaccine that has never been approved to date and for which no data on long-term side effects are available. All other vaccines meet this requirement and take years to develop and get approved. And even then people still die, get sick from the consequences of the vaccination. What would it look like with this vaccine? I don't want to imagine that and I think it's deeply irresponsible!
Since when do you have to vaccinate every1 for a flu? Why if it has been shown to be harmless to the great majority (Corona, 99% survival rate))? Isn't it enough just to "protect" the vulnerable groups with vaccination? What is happening here right now?
And by the way, I don't see myself in any of those positions. I don't take any medication and have not for more than 5 years.
17
