You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES I’m looking at you 🫵
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
13 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page:
Poll: Do you think you are problematic irl
Show results
problematc people you love
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
the smiths / lolita / azealia banks / lana / woody allen

i am very sorry

lukewarm take but all good artists are insane or “problematic” and as long as that shit is not the essence of their work its fine to enjoy it 
nobokov's lolita is only problematic if you have poor reading comprehension
yeah it irks me to no end when people think it’s glorifying/condoning pedophilia just because it writes about it in non black and white terms like thats not even the point of it

even then its like ... reading things that complicate sexual trauma past “abuser bad victim good” personally help me deal w my own shit but i get if thats not the case for everyone 
its pretty black and white lmao humbert destroys the girls entire life it's absolutely 'abuser bad but can disguise himself as good and thats how he finds his way into ur family to ruin ur daughters wholeass life'
21
Posts: 55674
Date: 30-12-2020 23:24
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
December wrote:
Limbs wrote:
gillian anderson
wait how is she problematic?? i love her so fucking much, scully is my rolemodel
she has said a few transphobic things, it's fairly minor though imo and i think her just being ignorant not malicious. link
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 30-12-2020 23:30
MabeI
Streetmusician



mabeI wrote:
lana del rey

i luv her music so mch but shes a tweak
5
Posts: 6
Date: 30-12-2020 23:31
Heist
National star



heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
nobokov's lolita is only problematic if you have poor reading comprehension
yeah it irks me to no end when people think it’s glorifying/condoning pedophilia just because it writes about it in non black and white terms like thats not even the point of it

even then its like ... reading things that complicate sexual trauma past “abuser bad victim good” personally help me deal w my own shit but i get if thats not the case for everyone 
its pretty black and white lmao humbert destroys the girls entire life it's absolutely 'abuser bad but can disguise himself as good and thats how he finds his way into ur family to ruin ur daughters wholeass life'
i mean more in the way humbert makes her the villain / seductress and people confuse that for nabokovs voice

and in a way she is not totally “innocent” like she does use sex to get money from humbert both as a child and at the end of the book but unless you have a single brain cell that is not evidence of nabokov saying she deserved any of what happened to her she is very obviously still the victim
17
Posts: 2105
Date: 30-12-2020 23:34
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
yeah it irks me to no end when people think it’s glorifying/condoning pedophilia just because it writes about it in non black and white terms like thats not even the point of it

even then its like ... reading things that complicate sexual trauma past “abuser bad victim good” personally help me deal w my own shit but i get if thats not the case for everyone 
its pretty black and white lmao humbert destroys the girls entire life it's absolutely 'abuser bad but can disguise himself as good and thats how he finds his way into ur family to ruin ur daughters wholeass life'
i mean more in the way humbert makes her the villain / seductress and people confuse that for nabokovs voice

and in a way she is not totally “innocent” like she does use sex to get money from humbert both as a child and at the end of the book but unless you have a single brain cell that is not evidence of nabokov saying she deserved any of what happened to her she is very obviously still the victim
yea its poor reading comprehension. nabokov makes it clear that humbert's an unreliable narrator so as the reader it's dumb to trust him.
21
Posts: 55674
Date: 30-12-2020 23:37
Heist
National star



heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
heist wrote:
Claire wrote:
its pretty black and white lmao humbert destroys the girls entire life it's absolutely 'abuser bad but can disguise himself as good and thats how he finds his way into ur family to ruin ur daughters wholeass life'
i mean more in the way humbert makes her the villain / seductress and people confuse that for nabokovs voice

and in a way she is not totally “innocent” like she does use sex to get money from humbert both as a child and at the end of the book but unless you have a single brain cell that is not evidence of nabokov saying she deserved any of what happened to her she is very obviously still the victim
yea its poor reading comprehension. nabokov makes it clear that humbert's an unreliable narrator so as the reader it's dumb to trust him.
ye ye exactly
17
Posts: 2105
Date: 30-12-2020 23:44
Talent
World famous



talent wrote:
heist wrote:
C4TH3DR4L wrote:
Only one I can think of is Hasan Piker but I think he isn't concidered ''problematic'' anymore?
the only thing problematic about hasan piker is that he is not my boyfriend
^
21
Posts: 17430
Date: 31-12-2020 00:09
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page:
© 2024 Terms of Use