veg-ans/etarians what do yall think about - Forum

Pavlov
International star

Pavlov wrote:

ouch wrote:
I think I kill

ud kill it even if it was a healthy animal though

DandelionMarie
International star

DandelionMarie wrote:
i am vegetarian and I think that if an animal is in pain its the right thing to put it to sleep, especially if there was no sign to get better! But I wouldn't eat if anyway

Private
Popstar

ouch wrote:

Pavlov wrote:

ouch wrote:
I think I kill

ud kill it even if it was a healthy animal though

Yes but no

Private
World famous

BloomCissi wrote:
Why are these questions always posed on the assumption that vegans/vegetarians think that killing animals is inherently wrong?

Pavlov
International star

Pavlov wrote:

BloomCissi wrote:
Why are these questions always posed on the assumption that vegans/vegetarians think that killing animals is inherently wrong?

does it look like im assuming im borderline vegetarian and dont care about animals dying, what is it with your assumptions of my assumptions

Lean
Streetmusician

lean wrote:
i don't think it's up to a random person to decide if an animal is sick/hurt enough to be killed.

i think if there was a way that a citizen could call an expert and go over the state of the animal, asses over the phone, and had proper means to swiftly kill the animal and had verbal approval from said expert, sure.

Kalypso
International star

kalypso wrote:
i dont see anything wrong in killing animals. it's the meat industry i'm against.

Kalypso
International star

kalypso wrote:
im a vegetarian

Pavlov
International star

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:
i don't think it's up to a random person to decide if an animal is sick/hurt enough to be killed.

i think if there was a way that a citizen could call an expert and go over the state of the animal, asses over the phone, and had proper means to swiftly kill the animal and had verbal approval from said expert, sure.

if a moose has been hit by a car going 60 mph its probably safe to say that it doesnt only have a scrape wound

Lean
Streetmusician

lean wrote:

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:
i don't think it's up to a random person to decide if an animal is sick/hurt enough to be killed.

i think if there was a way that a citizen could call an expert and go over the state of the animal, asses over the phone, and had proper means to swiftly kill the animal and had verbal approval from said expert, sure.

if a moose has been hit by a car going 60 mph its probably safe to say that it doesnt only have a scrape wound

if someone hit a moose, chances are the person's still in their car, under the moose, passed out and your first move should be to call an ambulance.

anyway, that's exactly what i'm saying. having verbal consent from a wildlife rescue/expert will make this less of a grey area. i don't trust random people to make that assumption because it's not always correct.

Pavlov
International star

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:
i don't think it's up to a random person to decide if an animal is sick/hurt enough to be killed.

i think if there was a way that a citizen could call an expert and go over the state of the animal, asses over the phone, and had proper means to swiftly kill the animal and had verbal approval from said expert, sure.

if a moose has been hit by a car going 60 mph its probably safe to say that it doesnt only have a scrape wound

if someone hit a moose, chances are the person's still in their car, under the moose, passed out and your first move should be to call an ambulance.

anyway, that's exactly what i'm saying. having verbal consent from a wildlife rescue/expert will make this less of a grey area. i don't trust random people to make that assumption because it's not always correct.

i never specified that u were the person who hit the moose u could just be a passerby

Pavlov
International star

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:

Pavlov wrote:
if a moose has been hit by a car going 60 mph its probably safe to say that it doesnt only have a scrape wound

if someone hit a moose, chances are the person's still in their car, under the moose, passed out and your first move should be to call an ambulance.

anyway, that's exactly what i'm saying. having verbal consent from a wildlife rescue/expert will make this less of a grey area. i don't trust random people to make that assumption because it's not always correct.

i never specified that u were the person who hit the moose u could just be a passerby

also it couldve been hit by a truck or a train

Lean
Streetmusician

lean wrote:

Pavlov wrote:

lean wrote:

Pavlov wrote:
if a moose has been hit by a car going 60 mph its probably safe to say that it doesnt only have a scrape wound

if someone hit a moose, chances are the person's still in their car, under the moose, passed out and your first move should be to call an ambulance.

anyway, that's exactly what i'm saying. having verbal consent from a wildlife rescue/expert will make this less of a grey area. i don't trust random people to make that assumption because it's not always correct.

i never specified that u were the person who hit the moose u could just be a passerby

i said /they're/ under the moose passed out, so /you/ the person who spots them should call 911.

i understand your question but what i'm saying is it should be allowed so long as you have confirmation/consent from an expert. then things can't get muddied legally.