Private
Private
Private
0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.
Klasifikovany wrote:
oh ok, I'll give it a tryPhysalis wrote:
And yes, I get how it can sound similar, but they are also pretty different. I bet also some schizophrenic people just have a superstrong intuition, but take that with a huge pinch of salt because if it greatly affects you in daily life you should get help in either case.
A lot of non-believers, as I was trying to highlight earlier, probably make this equation due to it's similaities, but is often to open to reflect on both sides which can be harmful to both the topic of schizophrenia and intuition.
Can you elaborate what exactly you mean with non-believers because it throws me off that you just sprinkle it in as if it's completely clear what exactly you are referring to?Klasifikovany wrote:
your description of what you believe is intuition sounds like someone describing schizophrenia, i was not saying it is schizophrenia, but it sounds like itÂ
oh ok -in that case at least I hopefully managed to bring forth the importance of not getting them mixed up <3 Sorry for the misunderstanding.your description of what you believe is intuition sounds like someone describing schizophrenia, i was not saying it is schizophrenia, but it sounds like itÂ
And yes, I get how it can sound similar, but they are also pretty different. I bet also some schizophrenic people just have a superstrong intuition, but take that with a huge pinch of salt because if it greatly affects you in daily life you should get help in either case.
A lot of non-believers, as I was trying to highlight earlier, probably make this equation due to it's similaities, but is often to open to reflect on both sides which can be harmful to both the topic of schizophrenia and intuition.
Hmm
when I use the term non-believers, I envision my encounters with critics whom are stuck in their need to have a definition to everything. So, if it's not widely accknowledged science today, in their mind -what we talk about, sounds like nonesense we are pulling out of our arses. In my experience, non-believers seem to have little ability or bravery to reflect outside the box and therefor tend to attack those who like to philosofize on these kind of things, with the typical "do you even believe in science?" and similar phrases, along with a condescending attitude in order to protect tehir own limited perseption of the world. So non-believers from my pov, are people who are dependent on a statement already being written in a book (by a famous or high ranked scientist) for everyone to read and accknowledged as a "scientific truth" world wide before even considering the possability
does this make sense? ahhÂ
13
