wrote: Are they true to size? And are they as broad as they seem in the front or do u know if they have smaller models bc im not rly that muxhtof a chunky shoes person but im out of luck w finding some new ones for winter that have space for a thick sole in the bottom and doesn't make me feel like a stick w marshmallows on (that would be the shoes)
Sylvan wrote: I would say they are true to size, yes. They are broad in the front, but I own one of the unisex models so I'm not sure if the ones exclusively available in 'women's sizes' are a bit more slender or not.
Account deleted
wrote:
Sylvan wrote: I would say they are true to size, yes. They are broad in the front, but I own one of the unisex models so I'm not sure if the ones exclusively available in 'women's sizes' are a bit more slender or not.
Thanks
Account deleted
wrote: I found some nice shoe alternatives from nae but they're difficult af to find secondhand
Account deleted
wrote: you can get the chelsea ones
Account deleted
wrote:
acidreflux wrote: you can get the chelsea ones
I'll look them up. Thanks, for telling me.
Account deleted
wrote:
Nesta wrote:
acidreflux wrote: you can get the chelsea ones
I'll look them up. Thanks, for telling me.
I think they might be a bit too low for winter
Account deleted
wrote: (also I've been totally heart-eyeing all white shoes atm like oouf i went from wanting everything in black to everything in white)
Account deleted
wrote: My brain bleeds from reading zalando reviews 😭
"are these shoes so clammy since they are sustainable?" Sustainability info: the leather is in a leather certification esque group
The answer is no. No they are not.
Account deleted
wrote: So I've found a pair of secondhand dr martens that doesn't look too bad. tise.com/t/XkWNkdYDj