wrote:
I'm reading about green transformation (grønn omstilling), and suffering through green capitalism to hopefully gain some more insight into how this works in Norway. I also asked my dad if he was for green capitalism or radical change (Transformation), as they were described in the norwegian article and thus suffer traslation errors. So now, i'm gonna ask you guys the same: also why.
the article descriptions, summarized and translated:
green capitalism - focuses on using the institutions that already exists. thinks the "green transformation\sustainable practices for the industries" should happen through market forces. values economic growth, and wealth for businesses. thinks this is the most cost-effective approach. improves or adapts to today and the future of society instead of doing any radical changes.
radical change - thinks green capitalism upholds the sustainability issue and that it is a matter of resources being used. believes in degrowth and prosperity without growth. fundemental changes has to happen across many sectors continually and not operate sector-to-sector based. requires a fundemental change in peoples though patterns and behaviors. we need more than only technological changes. we can't get stuck in the idea that society shouldn't change (norway particularly being stuck in oil-era thoughts and ideas).
I'm reading about green transformation (grønn omstilling), and suffering through green capitalism to hopefully gain some more insight into how this works in Norway. I also asked my dad if he was for green capitalism or radical change (Transformation), as they were described in the norwegian article and thus suffer traslation errors. So now, i'm gonna ask you guys the same: also why.

the article descriptions, summarized and translated:
green capitalism - focuses on using the institutions that already exists. thinks the "green transformation\sustainable practices for the industries" should happen through market forces. values economic growth, and wealth for businesses. thinks this is the most cost-effective approach. improves or adapts to today and the future of society instead of doing any radical changes.
radical change - thinks green capitalism upholds the sustainability issue and that it is a matter of resources being used. believes in degrowth and prosperity without growth. fundemental changes has to happen across many sectors continually and not operate sector-to-sector based. requires a fundemental change in peoples though patterns and behaviors. we need more than only technological changes. we can't get stuck in the idea that society shouldn't change (norway particularly being stuck in oil-era thoughts and ideas).



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


20