uhyre wrote:
son
www2.hm.com/no_no/productpage.0536139099.html
these pyjama pants. indistinguishable from plain sweats. bought bc they were light enough to not kill in the summer heat for sleep-pants needers. will wear outside bc they look just fine. not see through at all despite being decently thin. dont have pockets but theyre meant to be pajama pants so i forgive it. even tho my old ones did have pockets but i kept falling asleep with tweezers and open tapetkniver (wallpaper knives???) in my pocket so maybe i shouldnt have pajama pockets. also for some reason some of the lights at h&m are coloured so its impossible to tell colours of some items. i thought these were grey. theyre beige. the webpage also says grey but its the kind thats very clearly brown based. much more so irl than the catalogue pic (and irl h&m lighting) would lead u to believe
star of the show tho!!!!!!!! THIS FUCKING DRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wish the site had mroe flattering pics that showed the whole dress not just the hanger pic
www.ginatricot.com/no/klaer/kjolerjumpsuits/kjoler/dress-179749150

anyway i love it i bought it half a size up bc comfort and if they have ur size. and if u have wider set boobs. that are somewhat on the smaller side. ive contorted my body to hell and back in this thing and, WITHOUT A BRA; short of physically grabbing the tiddy and pulling it out there is literally no way for a slip to happen. which i never find to be the case for not-tight-chested summer dresses that have such a low neck. id trust this dress in the wind on a boat while drunk. boob stamp of approval
i dont know why the description says the dress is pink bc the pics r not lying, it has some pink flowers but the dress averages out at entirely purple even up close. they even listed it in their "purple" themed list
son
www2.hm.com/no_no/productpage.0536139099.html
these pyjama pants. indistinguishable from plain sweats. bought bc they were light enough to not kill in the summer heat for sleep-pants needers. will wear outside bc they look just fine. not see through at all despite being decently thin. dont have pockets but theyre meant to be pajama pants so i forgive it. even tho my old ones did have pockets but i kept falling asleep with tweezers and open tapetkniver (wallpaper knives???) in my pocket so maybe i shouldnt have pajama pockets. also for some reason some of the lights at h&m are coloured so its impossible to tell colours of some items. i thought these were grey. theyre beige. the webpage also says grey but its the kind thats very clearly brown based. much more so irl than the catalogue pic (and irl h&m lighting) would lead u to believe
star of the show tho!!!!!!!! THIS FUCKING DRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wish the site had mroe flattering pics that showed the whole dress not just the hanger pic
www.ginatricot.com/no/klaer/kjolerjumpsuits/kjoler/dress-179749150

anyway i love it i bought it half a size up bc comfort and if they have ur size. and if u have wider set boobs. that are somewhat on the smaller side. ive contorted my body to hell and back in this thing and, WITHOUT A BRA; short of physically grabbing the tiddy and pulling it out there is literally no way for a slip to happen. which i never find to be the case for not-tight-chested summer dresses that have such a low neck. id trust this dress in the wind on a boat while drunk. boob stamp of approval
i dont know why the description says the dress is pink bc the pics r not lying, it has some pink flowers but the dress averages out at entirely purple even up close. they even listed it in their "purple" themed list