FT: Diamond Member Speculation! - Forum

Private
Popstar

YSL wrote:

luminescence wrote:
I'll just let my dm expire and probs won't buy for a while, can buy the set cheaper from mp if I like it c:

same

Luna
Popstar

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

Damjal
World famous

Damjal wrote:

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

Our complaints is that its frustrating to see designers use clothes/items that already have been uploaded+released and then few weeks/motnhs later a another or more verisons of the same clothing/item being recoloured, like the first upload loses its value

Luna
Popstar

Luna wrote:

Damjal wrote:

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

Our complaints is that its frustrating to see designers use clothes/items that already have been uploaded+released and then few weeks/motnhs later a another or more verisons of the same clothing/item being recoloured, like the first upload loses its value

I know, I just think if a set is just a recycled recolour then that makes it lower quality, but I guess I didn't specify that

Account deleted

wrote:

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

before we could actually see the sets but then they took away that function bc it should be a "surprise" but honestly if i pay 175cr for something it better be worth at least 175cr wether i like it or not

Private
World famous

Cute wrote:
All honesty. I don't want recolors as DM.
just a wish and such.

Klavier
Minister of Pop

Klavier wrote:
oh ok so it wasnt the sets i though it would be

WRENCH
Youtube star

WRENCH wrote:
I’m rare
y disappointed in dm, but this week I can say I was. With the fem dm at least.

i’m ok With the Male one, as I like the hair

but yeah

Allie
Queen of Pop

Allie wrote:

Damjal wrote:

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

Our complaints is that its frustrating to see designers use clothes/items that already have been uploaded+released and then few weeks/motnhs later a another or more verisons of the same clothing/item being recoloured, like the first upload loses its value

In all fairness, this set is really old and probably as old as it's recolors too. Can't say much about why it was chosen though since it's the admin of each server who choose and I guess they all have different styles. But I donno. It was quiet few items and simple.

No matter what will be chosen for each DM week, they can never please everyone. But the goal ofc is to please as many as possible and I guess this didn't.

Private
World famous

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:

Damjal wrote:

Luna wrote:
I think something kinda needs to be done about dm.

The price either needs to be drastically lowered, the sets not be kept secret anymore, or actually set a standard for what can be accepted as dm. I know people don't like to compare and deem people's designs as a certain "quality," but the fact of the matter is some designs are just not as good as others and should not be the dm set. It's ridiculous how often dm sets are deemed a disappointment by an overwhelming amount of users.

Our complaints is that its frustrating to see designers use clothes/items that already have been uploaded+released and then few weeks/motnhs later a another or more verisons of the same clothing/item being recoloured, like the first upload loses its value

In all fairness, this set is really old and probably as old as it's recolors too. Can't say much about why it was chosen though since it's the admin of each server who choose and I guess they all have different styles. But I donno. It was quiet few items and simple.

No matter what will be chosen for each DM week, they can never please everyone. But the goal ofc is to please as many as possible and I guess this didn't.

I know it's not up to you or other designers or even Jess what's put up to DM but I reeaally hope Kaj would hear us out on this >-

Private
International star

Ahria wrote:

bowie wrote:
oh ok so it wasnt the sets i though it would be

Siskskks

Allie
Queen of Pop

Allie wrote:

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:

Damjal wrote:
Our complaints is that its frustrating to see designers use clothes/items that already have been uploaded+released and then few weeks/motnhs later a another or more verisons of the same clothing/item being recoloured, like the first upload loses its value

In all fairness, this set is really old and probably as old as it's recolors too. Can't say much about why it was chosen though since it's the admin of each server who choose and I guess they all have different styles. But I donno. It was quiet few items and simple.

No matter what will be chosen for each DM week, they can never please everyone. But the goal ofc is to please as many as possible and I guess this didn't.

I know it's not up to you or other designers or even Jess what's put up to DM but I reeaally hope Kaj would hear us out on this >-

It is Jess, Marie and Nath who choose the sets though. Not kaj.

Private
World famous

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:
In all fairness, this set is really old and probably as old as it's recolors too. Can't say much about why it was chosen though since it's the admin of each server who choose and I guess they all have different styles. But I donno. It was quiet few items and simple.

No matter what will be chosen for each DM week, they can never please everyone. But the goal ofc is to please as many as possible and I guess this didn't.

I know it's not up to you or other designers or even Jess what's put up to DM but I reeaally hope Kaj would hear us out on this >-

It is Jess, Marie and Nath who choose the sets though. Not kaj.

ohh ;_,
I know it's not easy to remember what sets has been used already but I reeaally don't like the idea of re-using sets in different colors :C or even items ;_;

WRENCH
Youtube star

WRENCH wrote:

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:

Cute wrote:
I know it's not up to you or other designers or even Jess what's put up to DM but I reeaally hope Kaj would hear us out on this >-

It is Jess, Marie and Nath who choose the sets though. Not kaj.

ohh ;_,
I know it's not easy to remember what sets has been used already but I reeaally don't like the idea of re-using sets in different colors :C or even items ;_;

Re-colour would work better as maybe a day code or shop in my opinion, rather than dm.

Account deleted

wrote:

WRENCH wrote:

Cute wrote:

Lily wrote:
It is Jess, Marie and Nath who choose the sets though. Not kaj.

ohh ;_,
I know it's not easy to remember what sets has been used already but I reeaally don't like the idea of re-using sets in different colors :C or even items ;_;

Re-colour would work better as maybe a day code or shop in my opinion, rather than dm.

i agree!