You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Merry Xmas everyone 🩵💚
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Forum team < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
FT: Diamond Member Speculation!
Teabag
World Famous



Teabag wrote:
Trainor wrote:
Teabag wrote:
Asdfghjkk EXCUSE ME?! Me?! Dm?! 
it was tweedle day for males today
It really was 😭❤️❤️
20
Posts: 41874
Date: 13-08-2021 21:11
Lunalighte
Youtube Star



lunalighte wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
This is just being rude tbh. The designer of this set probably still put a lot of effort into it, and they probably didnt even ask for it to be DM.
9
Posts: 56
Date: 13-08-2021 21:11
Private
National Star



bia wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
this ^ 
15
Posts: 3813
Date: 13-08-2021 21:11
Kino
Popstar



Kino wrote:
alright let’s keep the extremely negative criticism of someone’s work off the forums please
15
Posts: 9439
Date: 13-08-2021 21:11
Private
World Famous



Rotte wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
Idk i can't see phyx, but i might be wrong
yea it is maybe wof quality, but again we aren't really actually promise quality, so a refund probably ain't gonna be made 
21
Posts: 70329
Date: 13-08-2021 21:12
Private
World Famous



misjel wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
Hey you could have kept that to the private messages
20
Posts: 52330
Date: 13-08-2021 21:14
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
Hey you could have kept that to the private messages
Well, we can also spread our emotions public w/o getting people after us and telling what to do etc 👀
20
Posts: 78289
Date: 13-08-2021 21:21 | Times changed: 1
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
Hey you could have kept that to the private messages
Well, we can also spread our emotionals public w/o getting people after us and telling what to do etc 👀
i thought you apologised the last time you called out the DM set? 
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 13-08-2021 21:22
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Hey you could have kept that to the private messages
Well, we can also spread our emotionals public w/o getting people after us and telling what to do etc 👀
i thought you apologised the last time you called out the DM set? 
I never said it was pretty or ugly? 💀 i haven’t said anything about this set. 
20
Posts: 78289
Date: 13-08-2021 21:23
Callum
World Famous



callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
Well, we can also spread our emotionals public w/o getting people after us and telling what to do etc 👀
i thought you apologised the last time you called out the DM set? 
I never said it was pretty or ugly? 💀 i haven’t said anything about this set. 
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 13-08-2021 21:25
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
i thought you apologised the last time you called out the DM set? 
I never said it was pretty or ugly? 💀 i haven’t said anything about this set. 
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
20
Posts: 78289
Date: 13-08-2021 21:27
Private
World Famous



misjel wrote:
Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Ground wrote:
@Shadowjess .....cause the quality is this bad,, can we send the set to u and get 125cr back?  
Hey you could have kept that to the private messages
Well, we can also spread our emotions public w/o getting people after us and telling what to do etc 👀
You have to consider that the designer spent time and effort to make the set, it’s very likely that they didn’t have any say over where their set got allocated
20
Posts: 52330
Date: 13-08-2021 21:28
Private
World Famous



misjel wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
I never said it was pretty or ugly? 💀 i haven’t said anything about this set. 
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
Why are you here then
20
Posts: 52330
Date: 13-08-2021 21:28
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
Why are you here then
I am allowed to be here. 
20
Posts: 78289
Date: 13-08-2021 21:28
Private
World Famous



Rotte wrote:
lunalighte wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
This is just being rude tbh. The designer of this set probably still put a lot of effort into it, and they probably didnt even ask for it to be DM.
First person in awhile i have seen in my milk! 
21
Posts: 70329
Date: 13-08-2021 21:29
This topic is closed.
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use