You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
ArianaGrande
thas my cookie thas my juice
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Forum team < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
FT: Diamond Member Speculation!
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
Misjel wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
Why are you here then
I am allowed to be here. 
20
Posts: 76625
Date: 13-08-2021 21:28
Private
World famous



Rotte wrote:
lunalighte wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
This is just being rude tbh. The designer of this set probably still put a lot of effort into it, and they probably didnt even ask for it to be DM.
First person in awhile i have seen in my milk! 
21
Posts: 70325
Date: 13-08-2021 21:29
Teabag
World famous



Teabag wrote:
Taking this opportunity to thank the male community who never complain openly about specific sets lol
20
Posts: 40479
Date: 13-08-2021 21:31
Callum
World famous



callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
I never said it was pretty or ugly? 💀 i haven’t said anything about this set. 
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
it is an unkind thing to do when you comment publicly negative things on an unpaid designers work. you are defending another doing that AFTER previously apologising for doing the same -  so why act brand new?
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 13-08-2021 21:38
Leenie
National star



Leenie wrote:
lunalighte wrote:
Ground wrote:
Angelica wrote:
doubt that would work out. 
Not everyone used 125 worth and tecnically it's just how it is, even if the quality ain't good, it's not really promised?
i know that every set is not worth it
but this set is something completely else.... like it doesn't even look like it would be good for wof or hof,,, n that says a lot
++++++ the skin is very heavily phyx influenced,, if not totally copied
This is just being rude tbh. The designer of this set probably still put a lot of effort into it, and they probably didnt even ask for it to be DM.

.
12
Posts: 225
Date: 13-08-2021 21:40
Leenie
National star



Leenie wrote:
Trainor wrote:
alright let’s keep the extremely negative criticism of someone’s work off the forums please

exactly
some of you guys are the reason why some people may stop designing, it is just toxic and people might lose interest or no longer even dare to design anymore since they have to fear of negative shit talk
12
Posts: 225
Date: 13-08-2021 21:44 | Times changed: 1
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
never said you did… it’s just publicly talking about sets negatively makes the designers feel a bit shit. i think it’s something to avoid doing and stick to DMs. i guess what im saying is i don’t understand why you’re adamant on defending that? it’s not very nice for the designers 
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
it is an unkind thing to do when you comment publicly negative things on an unpaid designers work. you are defending another doing that AFTER previously apologising for doing the same -  so why act brand new?
Again, i did nothing. I wrote that some people Express themself in here, i haven’t done in a long time. And still are you after me after how long time ago i wrote an appoligy to a designer. 
20
Posts: 76625
Date: 13-08-2021 21:45
Callum
World famous



callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
I dont want to discuss something i haven’t done. 
it is an unkind thing to do when you comment publicly negative things on an unpaid designers work. you are defending another doing that AFTER previously apologising for doing the same -  so why act brand new?
Again, i did nothing. I wrote that some people Express themself in here, i haven’t done in a long time. And still are you after me after how long time ago i wrote an appoligy to a designer. 
im not after you… i was genuinely curious. my point was that if you apologised, why would you want to co-sign someone else doing the same thing?

but you wish to avoid giving an answer so ill respect that 
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 13-08-2021 21:47
Private
Princess of Pop



Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
it is an unkind thing to do when you comment publicly negative things on an unpaid designers work. you are defending another doing that AFTER previously apologising for doing the same -  so why act brand new?
Again, i did nothing. I wrote that some people Express themself in here, i haven’t done in a long time. And still are you after me after how long time ago i wrote an appoligy to a designer. 
im not after you… i was genuinely curious. my point was that if you apologised, why would you want to co-sign someone else doing the same thing?

but you wish to avoid giving an answer so ill respect that 
just leave it here, thanks. 
20
Posts: 76625
Date: 13-08-2021 21:51
Callum
World famous



callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
callum wrote:
Limited wrote:
Again, i did nothing. I wrote that some people Express themself in here, i haven’t done in a long time. And still are you after me after how long time ago i wrote an appoligy to a designer. 
im not after you… i was genuinely curious. my point was that if you apologised, why would you want to co-sign someone else doing the same thing?

but you wish to avoid giving an answer so ill respect that 
just leave it here, thanks. 
that’s what i said i would do 
22
Posts: 31649
Date: 13-08-2021 21:53
Alam
World famous



Alam wrote:
Y'all are so fucking rude, the set isn't even that bad. Gd, imagine feeling so entitled to getting free pixel clothes.
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 13-08-2021 21:57
Talent
World famous



talent wrote:
Alam wrote:
Y'all are so fucking rude, the set isn't even that bad. Gd, imagine feeling so entitled to getting free pixel clothes.
to their credit it isnt free as credits r spent on it but yeah there are nicer ways to go about it
21
Posts: 17412
Date: 13-08-2021 22:00
Alam
World famous



Alam wrote:
talent wrote:
Alam wrote:
Y'all are so fucking rude, the set isn't even that bad. Gd, imagine feeling so entitled to getting free pixel clothes.
to their credit it isnt free as credits r spent on it but yeah there are nicer ways to go about it
Virtual currency aside, it's free. Also it's a surprise, the whole point is you don't know what you get, so if you don't like it that's on you.
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 13-08-2021 22:01
Private
Popstar



rottomilko wrote:
dm is kinda as a lottery - sometimes u “win” n sometimes u “lose” an y’all should know this by now
please stop being rude and criticize someone else’s work.
21
Posts: 31977
Date: 13-08-2021 22:01 | Times changed: 1
Alam
World famous



Alam wrote:
Melk wrote:
dm is kinda as a lottery - sometimes u “win” n sometimes u “lose” an ya’ll should know this by now
please stop being rude and criticize someone else’s work.
Honestly, saying someone's design is bad quality is so vague I wouldn't even call it criticism. 
20
Posts: 23097
Date: 13-08-2021 22:02
This topic is closed.
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use