You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Themis
I dont love u but u are valid and I appreciate u and hope u have a nice day
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Game < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
swastika??
Aquilera
Youtube Star



Aquilera wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
VlCE wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Why? Because it's true?
no because its petty, as everyones already said its angled because her hand is, you're really trying too hard to prove that shes used the nazi version
She did use the Nazi version? It's not angled because her hand is angled, if she would press her hands on a piece of paper and the drawing would be done with ink, it would be a Swastika?
Swastika doesnt equal to the nazi version 
18
Posts: 21937
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Private
National Star



Dilf wrote:
I'm only going to say one thing.

Why make it a big deal?
Solovey made the set to "represent" the Hindu religion.

We should appreciate the outfit instead of trying to pick it apart and prove something meaningless.
17
Posts: 3337
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Fiskarna
World Famous



Fiskarna wrote:
you cant be serious ?  the hand is like 4 pixels wide, theres not a lot of room for details (like making sure the symbol is rotated juust right with the hand)
18
Posts: 7128
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Account deleted




wrote:
Harness wrote:
VlCE wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
If you look close at the under (?) hand, you can see the Swastika is actually rotated, even if she wouldn't bend her hands.
just stop lmao
u think thats funny?
The over reacting in this thread is beyond hilarious.
Unfortunate situation and misunderstanding.


But gat damn vp, never change lol
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Private
International Star



vig wrote:
Dilf wrote:
I'm only going to say one thing.

Why make it a big deal?
Solovey made the set to "represent" the Hindu religion.

We should appreciate the outfit instead of trying to pick it apart and prove something meaningless.
I agree, I believe she made a Ganpati set which is the last of these Hindu sets. I am looking forward to that one 
20
Posts: 22599
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Capitaine
Youtube Star



Capitaine wrote:
Aquilera wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
VlCE wrote:
no because its petty, as everyones already said its angled because her hand is, you're really trying too hard to prove that shes used the nazi version
She did use the Nazi version? It's not angled because her hand is angled, if she would press her hands on a piece of paper and the drawing would be done with ink, it would be a Swastika?
Swastika doesnt equal to the nazi version 
What?
11
Posts: 5637
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Private
International Star



Rhaella wrote:
Hahhah, only on vp can something like this happen. over 10 pages of stupid debate about a religious symbol, because "omg nazis!!1!!"
12
Posts: 2222
Date: 14-03-2017 19:22
Private
International Star



ThugWorkout wrote:
Fiskarna wrote:
you cant be serious ?  the hand is like 4 pixels wide, theres not a lot of room for details (like making sure the symbol is rotated juust right with the hand)
also this is exactly what I was thinking
have u seen the size of that tiny hand
im impressed she went into the trouble of adding small details like that
18
Posts: 21745
Date: 14-03-2017 19:23
Aquilera
Youtube Star



Aquilera wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Aquilera wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
She did use the Nazi version? It's not angled because her hand is angled, if she would press her hands on a piece of paper and the drawing would be done with ink, it would be a Swastika?
Swastika doesnt equal to the nazi version 
What?
Swastika is more than just the one used for nazism?
18
Posts: 21937
Date: 14-03-2017 19:23
Botany
National Star



Botany wrote:
vig wrote:
Dilf wrote:
I'm only going to say one thing.

Why make it a big deal?
Solovey made the set to "represent" the Hindu religion.

We should appreciate the outfit instead of trying to pick it apart and prove something meaningless.
I agree, I believe she made a Ganpati set which is the last of these Hindu sets. I am looking forward to that one 
ouuu yay :d
21
Posts: 3567
Date: 14-03-2017 19:23
Private
National Star



Teacup wrote:
Dilf wrote:
I'm only going to say one thing.

Why make it a big deal?
Solovey made the set to "represent" the Hindu religion.

We should appreciate the outfit instead of trying to pick it apart and prove something meaningless.
17
Posts: 2612
Date: 14-03-2017 19:23
Capitaine
Youtube Star



Capitaine wrote:
Aquilera wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Aquilera wrote:
Swastika doesnt equal to the nazi version 
What?
Swastika is more than just the one used for nazism?
I know? I said that before? It was used in Rome, Greece, Roman Empire, even the Norwegian Vikings used it.
11
Posts: 5637
Date: 14-03-2017 19:24
Account deleted




wrote:
This is why VP can't ever have anything nice 
You'll always nitpick it 
Date: 14-03-2017 19:24
Private
National Star



Teacup wrote:
ThugWorkout wrote:
Fiskarna wrote:
you cant be serious ?  the hand is like 4 pixels wide, theres not a lot of room for details (like making sure the symbol is rotated juust right with the hand)
also this is exactly what I was thinking
have u seen the size of that tiny hand
im impressed she went into the trouble of adding small details like that
17
Posts: 2612
Date: 14-03-2017 19:24
Account deleted




wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
This is why VP can't ever have anything nice 
You'll always nitpick it 
Date: 14-03-2017 19:25
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use